Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1998 Mar 15;26(6):1369–1372. doi: 10.1093/nar/26.6.1369

Mutational analysis of the RNA pseudoknot involved in efficient ribosomal frameshifting in simian retrovirus-1.

D Sung 1, H Kang 1
PMCID: PMC147434  PMID: 9490779

Abstract

Mutational effects on frameshifting efficiency of the RNA pseudoknot involved in ribosomal frameshifting in simian retrovirus-1 (SRV-1) have been investigated. The primary sequence and the proposed secondary structure of the SRV-1 pseudoknot are similar to those of other efficient frameshifting pseudoknots in mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) and feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV), where an unpaired adenine nucleotide intercalates between stem 1 and stem 2. In SRV-1 pseudoknot, the adenine nucleotide in between stem 1 and stem 2 has a potential to form an A*U base pair with the last uridine nucleotide in the loop 2, resulting in a continuous A-form helix with coaxially stacked stem 1 and stem 2. To test whether this A*U base pairing and coaxial stacking of stem 1 and stem 2 is absolutely required for efficient frameshifting in SRV-1, a series of mutants changing this potential A.U base pair to either G.C base pair or A.A, A.G, A.C, G.A, G.G mismatch is generated, and their frameshifting efficiencies are investigated in vitro using rabbit reticulocyte lysate translation assay. The frameshifting abilities of these mutant pseudoknots are similar to that of the wild-type pseudoknot, suggesting that the A*U base pair in between stem 1 and stem 2 is not necessary to promote efficient frameshifting in SRV-1. These results reveal that coaxial stacking of stem 1 and stem 2 with a Watson-Crick A.U base pair in between two stems is not a required structural feature of the pseudoknot for promoting efficient frameshifting in SRV-1. Our mutational data suggest that SRV-1 pseudoknot adopts similar structural features common to other efficient frameshifting pseudoknots as observed in MMTV and FIV.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (150.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bernstein S. I., Milligan R. A. Fine tuning a molecular motor: the location of alternative domains in the Drosophila myosin head. J Mol Biol. 1997 Aug 8;271(1):1–6. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brierley I. Ribosomal frameshifting viral RNAs. J Gen Virol. 1995 Aug;76(Pt 8):1885–1892. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-76-8-1885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen X., Chamorro M., Lee S. I., Shen L. X., Hines J. V., Tinoco I., Jr, Varmus H. E. Structural and functional studies of retroviral RNA pseudoknots involved in ribosomal frameshifting: nucleotides at the junction of the two stems are important for efficient ribosomal frameshifting. EMBO J. 1995 Feb 15;14(4):842–852. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07062.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen X., Kang H., Shen L. X., Chamorro M., Varmus H. E., Tinoco I., Jr A characteristic bent conformation of RNA pseudoknots promotes -1 frameshifting during translation of retroviral RNA. J Mol Biol. 1996 Jul 26;260(4):479–483. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hatfield D. L., Levin J. G., Rein A., Oroszlan S. Translational suppression in retroviral gene expression. Adv Virus Res. 1992;41:193–239. doi: 10.1016/S0065-3527(08)60037-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jacks T. Translational suppression in gene expression in retroviruses and retrotransposons. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1990;157:93–124. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-75218-6_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kang H., Hines J. V., Tinoco I., Jr Conformation of a non-frameshifting RNA pseudoknot from mouse mammary tumor virus. J Mol Biol. 1996 May 31;259(1):135–147. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kang H., Tinoco I., Jr A mutant RNA pseudoknot that promotes ribosomal frameshifting in mouse mammary tumor virus. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 May 15;25(10):1943–1949. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.10.1943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Morikawa S., Bishop D. H. Identification and analysis of the gag-pol ribosomal frameshift site of feline immunodeficiency virus. Virology. 1992 Feb;186(2):389–397. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(92)90004-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Shen L. X., Tinoco I., Jr The structure of an RNA pseudoknot that causes efficient frameshifting in mouse mammary tumor virus. J Mol Biol. 1995 Apr 14;247(5):963–978. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Somogyi P., Jenner A. J., Brierley I., Inglis S. C. Ribosomal pausing during translation of an RNA pseudoknot. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Nov;13(11):6931–6940. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.11.6931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Tu C., Tzeng T. H., Bruenn J. A. Ribosomal movement impeded at a pseudoknot required for frameshifting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Sep 15;89(18):8636–8640. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.18.8636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. ten Dam E. B., Verlaan P. W., Pleij C. W. Analysis of the role of the pseudoknot component in the SRV-1 gag-pro ribosomal frameshift signal: loop lengths and stability of the stem regions. RNA. 1995 Apr;1(2):146–154. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. ten Dam E., Brierley I., Inglis S., Pleij C. Identification and analysis of the pseudoknot-containing gag-pro ribosomal frameshift signal of simian retrovirus-1. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Jun 25;22(12):2304–2310. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.12.2304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES