Skip to main content
. 2006 Apr 10;1:4. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-1-4

Table 5.

Importance given to each outcome, listed according to the median of responses. Pre and post Consensus Meeting results.

Rank obtained Importance
Post Pre Chi
Outcome Post Pre Primary Secondary Primary Secondary P
Aesthetics 1 4 84% 9% 58% 32% <0.01
Quality of life 2 2 75% 6% 63% 26% <0.01
Psychological well-being 3 72% 6%
Disability 4 7 66% 16% 47% 21% <0.01
Back Pain 5 9 59% 22% 32% 58% <0.01
Rib hump 6 3 53% 22% 63% 26% <0.01
Breathing function 7 6 44% 31% 53% 42% <0.01
Progression in adulthood 8 1 41% 31% 63% 21% <0.01
Needs of further treatments in adulthood 9 8 38% 38% 47% 42% NS
Knowledge and understanding of scoliosis in general and their specific pattern 10 34% 28%
Balance 11 34% 31%

Scoliosis Cobb degrees (radiographic lateral flexion) 12 5 28% 44% 53% 32% <0.05
Self control of posture 13 25% 38%
Movement of the vertebral column (sagittal plane) 14 22% 38%
Perdriolle degrees (radiographic rotation) 15 11 19% 50% 21% 53% <0.01
Kypho-lordosis Cobb degrees (radiographic lateral alignment) 16 10 16% 50% 26% 42% <0.01
Sensory motor integration of the corrective ideal pattern 17 16% 41%
Exercise efficiency 18 16% 38%
Equality of weight bearing 19 13% 31%
Improved body motor awareness and motor learning skills 20 3% 56%
Improved processing of vestibular input 21 3% 47%

Post: answers to second questionnaire, proposed after the Consensus Meeting (32 responders) – Pre: answers to first questionnaire, proposed before Consensus Meeting (19 responders) – Chi: Chi-square test