Skip to main content
. 2006 May;44(5):1831–1833. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.5.1831-1833.2006

TABLE 3.

Comparative reactivities between the current Multispot study and OQ HIV-1 false-negative specimens

Reactivity Result for specimen type
TACC NHS, 2004-2005 (n = 248)
OQ FN, 2000a (n = 4)
No. reactive (%) Mean ± SD No. reactive (%) Mean ± SDb
Multispot reactivity
    Spot 1 248 (100) 3.13 ± 0.33 4 (100) 3.75 ± 0.5
    Spot 2 0 (0) 0.0 ± 0.0 0 (0) 0.0 ± 0.0
    Spot 3 248 (100) 3.64 ± 0.68 4 (100) 2.25 ± 0.96
    Spot 4 248 (100) 3.94 ± 0.24 4 (100) 2.00 ± 0.82
Western blot reactivity
    p24 248 (100) 1.94 ± 0.23 4 (100) 1.00 ± 0.00
    gp41 246 (99.2) 1.90 ± 0.32 4 (100) 0.88 ± 0.25
    gp120 248 (100) 1.93 ± 0.25 4 (100) 1.25 ± 0.50
    gp160 248 (100) 2.00 ± 0.00 4 (100) 2.00 ± 0.00
EIA reactivity for HIV-1 248 (100) 4 (100)
No. (%) of specimens HIV-1 positivec 248 (100) 4 (100)
a

OQ FN, OQ HIV-1 false-negative subjects (7).

b

For comparisons between OQ false negatives and TACC NHS semiquantitative Multispot and Western blot reactivity, P was <0.0001 for all comparisons except for spot 2 and gp160, where the P value was 1.000 (Mann-Whitney U).

c

HIV-1 positivity was determined by a comparison of EIA and WB results.