Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2006 Jun 14.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006 Jan 25;92(3):234–241. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.12.001

Table 2.

Comparison of mean ± standard error of the mean cross-sectional area (CSA) in cm2 calculated using “normal” fiber direction with that calculated using remaining fiber direction

Location 1 Location 2 Location 3 Location 4
CSA perpendicular to ‘normal’ muscle direction 0.19 ± 0.06 1.19 ± 0.23 2.12 ± 0.19 2.43 ± 0.18
CSA perpendicular to remaining muscle direction 0.24 ± 0.10 1.15 ± 0.20 2.09 ± 0.20 2.31 ± 0.20
P-value 0.24 0.33 0.60 0.42