Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2006 Jun 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomech Eng. 2005 Feb;127(1):15–24. doi: 10.1115/1.1835348

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

(A) The storage modulus significantly increased as the cycling amplitude increased, but was not affected by changes in cyclic frequency (p <0.001 and p =0.43, two-factor ANOVA with Tukey). (B) The loss modulus significantly increased with haversine amplitude, but was unaffected by cycling frequency (p <0.001 and p =0.184, respectively, two-factor ANOVA with Tukey). (C) The complex modulus significantly increased with haversine amplitude, but was unaffected by cycling frequency (p< 0.001 and p =0.294, respectively, two-factor ANOVA with Tukey). Error bars are standard deviations. ^-Statistically significant (p <0.05) from all frequencies at 40% strain;*-Statistically significant (p <0.05) from all frequencies at 50% strain.