Skip to main content
. 2006 Summer;39(2):189–202. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2006.163-04

Table 1. Summary Data for the Descriptive Assessment of Preferences.

Participant
Abe Bo Cathy Dana Ed Fay Gina Han Inga Jan
Total number of PAs 11 11 11 11 9 10 8 6 11 16
Number of baseline PAs 11 11 11 11 9 10 8 6 4 6
Mean number of days between PAs 9 9.6 8.9 9.2 12.6 9.2 8.7 25 9.7 11.4
Range of days between PAs 7–13 7–13 7–11 7–15 7–26 7–13 7–19 8–106 7–13 7–22
Total number of days in assessment 90 96 89 92 101 83 70 151 97 181
Percentage of PAs with IOA 63.6 81.8 63.6 63.6 66.7 70 50 50 63.6 68.8
Mean IOA 100 99.4 99.2 99.2 100 97.2 100 100 98.4 99.5
Lowest IOA score 94.4 94.4 94.4 94.4 88.9 94.4
Mean correlation between each PA and every other PA (stability measure) .28 .18 .68 .57 .65 .60 .71 .74 .70 .76
Mean correlation between first and subsequent baseline PAs (predictive validity measure) −.11 .15 .32 .44 .49 .64 .67 .85 .77 .71

Note. The numbers in bold face represent mean correlation coefficients that exceeded a critical r value. PA  =  preference assessment; IOA  =  interobserver agreement.