Table 1.
Facility | Hierarchical Level | Total # of Participants | Total # of Interviews | |||
Primary Care Personnel | Middle/Support Management | Facility Leadership | ||||
High Performers | 1 | 14 | 2 | 3 | 19 | 8 |
2 | 6 | 10 | 7 | 23 | 14 | |
3 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 14 | 9 | |
Low Performers | 4 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 16 | 8 |
5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 11 | 7 | |
6 | 7 | 10 | 2 | 19 | 8 | |
Total | 41 | 38 | 23 | 102 | 54 |
Note: Facilities are listed in decreasing order of performance. No significant differences in the distributions of participants were found by facility or hierarchical level (χ210 = 17.4, n.s.).