Table 2.
Greenland | Warsaw | Sweden | Kharkiv | ALL*4 | All study group data*5 | ||
XER*1RLU/ml serum | N | 72 | 98 | 100 | 88 | 358 | 0.003 |
Median | 2.89 | 3.09 | 3.04 | 3.15 | 3.05 | ||
Mean | 2.92 | 3.30 | 3.22 | 3.17 | 3.17 | ||
Min | 1.0 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 1.0 | 1.1 | ||
Max | 6.0 | 6.5 | 12 | 8.0 | 12 | ||
% agonist | 1 | 21 | 12 | 14 | - | ||
% antagonist | 35 | 5 | 12 | 17 | - | ||
XER-EEQ pg/g lipid*2 | N | 1♣ | 21 | 10 | 11 | 43 | 0.63 |
Median | - | 103 | 76♥ | 139 | 114 | ||
Mean | - | 166 | 161 | 179 | 171 | ||
Min | - | 44 | 50 | 80 | 44 | ||
Max | - | 516 | 364 | 580 | 580 | ||
XER comp*3RLU/ml serum | N | 72 | 94 | 94 | 88 | 348 | < 0.001 |
Median | 2.65 | 2.96 | 2.90 | 2.88 | 2.86 | ||
Mean | 2.69 | 3.29 | 2.89 | 2.87 | 2.95 | ||
Min | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.0 | ||
Max | 3.8 | 7.0 | 6.8 | 4.5 | 7.0 | ||
% add/syn | 1 | 13 | 3 | 1 | - | ||
% antagonist | 71 | 7 | 19 | 30 | - | ||
CB-153 ng/g lipid | N | 74 | 100 | 98 | 82 | 354 | < 0.001 |
Median | 220 | 16 | 210 | 47 | 79 | ||
Min | 5.1 | 33 | 4.1 | 5.5 | 3.3 | ||
Max | 5500 | 130 | 1500 | 200 | 5500 | ||
DDE ng/g lipid | N | 74 | 100 | 98 | 82 | 354 | < 0.001 |
Median | 630 | 570 | 240 | 880 | 560 | ||
Min | 66 | 240 | 55 | 324 | 55 | ||
Max | 13000 | 2100 | 2300 | 12000 | 13000 |
In the independent assays significant differences between the triple serum extract determinations and their respective solvent controls (% agonists/additive/synergistic) and % antagonists, were tested by the Student's t-test (Microsoft Office Excel, significance level p = 0.05). *1: XER: Xenoestrogenic agonistic or antagonistic activity of serum extract alone: the solvent control = 3.13 RLU/ml serum. % agonistic and % antagonistic indicates the % of samples eliciting a significantly increase or decrease in XER activity compared to solvent control, which was set to 1. *2: XER-estradiol equivalence (XER-EEQ) of the samples eliciting significantly agonistic activity; data calculated by interpolation to the E2 dose response curve using the sigma plot program. ♥ : One Swedish sample was too high to calculate the XER-EEQ. ♣ : One serum sample from Greenland only had an agonistic action, thus no XER-EEQ value is given. *3: XERcomp; XER competitive activity of serum extract + 25 pM 17β-estradiol (E2-EC40); % add/syn: additive/synergistic and % antagonistic indicates the % of samples responding with a further increase or a decrease of the E2-EC40 induced activity, respectively, compared to the E2-EC40 solvent control = 3.13 RLU/ml serum, which was set to 1;. *4: XER activity includes 358 samples, however, only 348 of theses samples were applied to the XERcomp analyses. All of the samples had CB-153 and p,p'-DDE determined. *5: One-way ANOVA (p value) evaluation of the combined study group data except for XER-EEQ including only the European groups. In transformed data was used.