Skip to main content
. 2006 Apr 3;6:44. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-44

Table 1.

SAQ administration response rates and floor and ceiling effects

percent floor/percent ceiling
SAQ Version-Country # sites n returned n administered response rate teamwork climate safety climate perceptions of management job satisfaction working conditions stress recognition

ICU-UK 106 4856 7390 65.7% .08/6.41 .02/1.77 1.15/.27 .37/2.10 .31/1.55 .58/3.53
ICU-NZ 20 761 1054 72.2% .26/2.50 .00/1.32 1.19/.13 .92/1.18 .26/.66 .13/8.54
ICU USA 53 3029 4415 68.6% .10/3.11 .00/2.28 1.06/1.72 .13/5.09 .40/2.88 .73/6.48
Inpatient-USA 11 1531 2330 65.7% .13/4.02 .07/4.52 1.32/3.43 .39/7.72 .86/3.29 .86/7.83
OR-UK/NZ 2 385 575 67.0% .00/1.04 .00/.52 2.86/.00 1.04/1.04 1.30/.78 .26/14.58
Ambulatory Clinic-USA 11 281 420 67.0% .00/14.23 .00/4.98 .71/2.85 .00/12.10 2.50/6.79 6.43/5.36
OVERALL 203 10843 16184 67.0% .10/4.90 .00/2.30 1.20/1.20 .40/3.90 .50/2.20 .80/5.80

This chart details the number of clinical areas within an SAQ administration, the number of respondents, and the response rate. Note: percentage floor/percentage ceiling = the percent of scores at the extremes of the scaling range

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure