Skip to main content
. 2006 Jun 6;103(24):9124–9129. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603312103

Table 2.

Estimated age of eight nodes on phylogenetic trees reconstructed with rbcL and trnL+trnLtrnF sequence data using either linearized trees method or NPRS and a comparison of these ages with those obtained by Wikström et al. (22) based on a combined data set of rbcL and atpB

Node Split Linearized trees
NPRS
Wikström (ML)
rbcL trn data rbcL trn data
A Acorus 132 132 134 132 147
B Alismatales 126.1 112.2 118
C Arecales from Asparagales 84.1 78.2 81.6 88.9
D Asparagales 69 60 60
E Asparagaceae/Anthericaceae + Agavaceae 47.3 39.3 49
F Behniaceae 31.1 32.1 35
G Anthericaceae/Agavaceae clade+ 32.6 29.1 31.7 34.2 35
H Agavaceae clade+ 20.5 ± 2.1 23.4 ± 2.2 22.4 ± 1.7 25.8 ± 3.4
I Agave sensu lato 8.8 ± 2.2 7.9 ± 1.7 8.3 ± 2.4 9.8 ± 3.3
J Yucca 13.4 ± 2.7 18.3 ± 3.1 14.1 ± 3.0 17.2 ± 2.3

The nodes letters refer to those indicated in Fig. 3 (rbcL) and Fig. 1 (trnL+trnL−trnF). +, clade containing the Agavaceae also includes Hosta, Camassia, and Chlorogalum; ML, maximum likelihood.