Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Evolution. 2006 Jan;60(1):1–12.

Table 5.

Parameter estimates for the human microsatellite data. See the text for an explanation of the difference between the two models.

Hierarchical beta model Reduced model
Parameter Mean (2.5%, 97.5%) Mean (2.5%, 97.5%)
π 0.3401 (0.3301, 0.3506) n.a.1
θx 0.0294 (0.0283, 0.0306) 0.0293 (0.0283, 0.0305)
θy 0.0784 (0.0729, 0.0845) 0.0760 (0.0704, 0.0818)
θv 0.0298 (0.0237, 0.0370) n.a.
ρ1 0.8010 (0.7869, 0.8149) 0.7371 (0.7191, 0.7552)
ρ2 0.2253 (0.1847, 0.2708) n.a.

θ(I)

0.1322

(0.1254, 0.1395)

0.1031

(0.0979, 0.1087)
θ(II*) 0.1055 (0.1000, 0.1115) 0.1031 (0.0979, 0.1087)
θK(II) 0.0784 (0.0729, 0.0845) 0.0760 (0.0705, 0.0818)
θE(II) 0.0271 (0.0260, 0.0282) 0.0271 (0.0261, 0.0282)
θ(III) 2 0.1046 (0.1031, 0.1060) 0.1052 (0.1039, 0.1067)
1

Parameters not estimated in the reduced model are reported as not applicable.

2

θ(III) based on the observed number of population clusters and populations.