Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2006 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Ther. 2006 Jun;37(2):120–130. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2005.06.001

Table 5.

Comparison of Credible Comparison Treatment with Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) on Common Factors: Means (and Standard Deviations)

Common Factor Comparison DBT
Therapeutic Alliance
Session 6 (Patient Rating of Therapists)a 89.3 (9.3) 94.9 (13.6)
Session6 (Patient Rating of Fellow Patients) a 4.9 (0.7) 5.1 (0.7)
Session 12 (Patient Rating of Therapists)b 94.6 (14.4) 96.8 (9.8)
Session 12 (Patient Rating of Fellow Patients) b 5.1 (0.9) 5.0 (0.7)
Session 4 (Therapist Rating of Alliance) 4.3 (0.8) 4.2 (0.9)
Session 12 (Therapist Rating of Alliance) c 4.0 (1.1) 4.3 (.9)
Systems of Explanation/Therapeutic Rationale
Pretreatment (Patient Rating) 8.8 (1.4) 9.2 (1.4)
Session 1 (Patient Rating) 7.7 (2.3) 8.8(1.3)
Session 4 (Therapist Assessment of Suitability) 4.1 (0.8) 4.2 (0.8)
Session 12 (Therapist Assessment of Suitability) 3.9 (0.9) 4.3 (0.9)
Therapeutic Optimism
Pretreatment (Patient Rating of Expectancy) 7.3 (1.6) 7.9 (2.1)
Session 1 (Patient Rating of Expectancy) d 7.0 (1.7) 7.7 (1.7)
Session 4 (Therapist Optimism about Patient) 4.0 (0.7) 4.1 (0.8)
Session 12 (Therapist Optimism about Patient) 3.7* (1.0) 4.3* (0.9)

Note. Refer to Table 4 for description of assessments.

*

Difference between means p=.0.015. No other comparisons reached statistical significance p< .05. n=30 per condition unless noted

a

n = 28 (Comparison), n=30 (DBT)

b

n=26 (Comparison), n=30 (DBT)

c

n=29 (Comparison), n=30 (DBT)

d

n=21 (Comparison), n=21 (DBT)