Skip to main content
. 2006 Jul;5(7):1136–1146. doi: 10.1128/EC.00383-05

TABLE 1.

Comparison of protein phosphorylation changes

Spot no. Mol mass (kDa) pI Relative phosphorylation change (1 min/0 min)a
P
HS176 (ERK2 WT) HS174 (erk2)
1 50 6.3 1.63 ± 0.45 1.54 ± 0.35 0.44
2 44 6.5 2.72 ± 0.95 1.95 ± 0.86 0.29
3 45 5.9 2.95 ± 0.29 1.22 ± 0.06 <0.01
4 46 5.7 2.00 ± 0.39 0.70 ± 0.23 0.02
5 42 5.9 1.59 ± 0.40 2.01 ± 0.78 0.32
6 40 4.8 3.52 ± 1.43 0.91 ± 0.22 0.07
7 40 4.2 0.98 ± 0.37 1.48 ± 0.67 0.28
8 38 4.9 1.94 ± 0.74 1.07 ± 0.43 0.18
9 38 4.7 2.52 ± 0.55 1.22 ± 0.66 0.10
10 36 4.7 3.94 ± 0.71 0.94 ± 0.29 0.01
11 37 4.4 3.61 ± 2.20 0.88 ± 0.22 0.14
12 36 6.6 1.49 ± 0.43 0.96 ± 0.36 0.20
13 38 5.9 0.98 ± 0.34 1.29 ± 0.60 0.34
14 34 4.7 3.82 ± 1.12 1.35 ± 0.57 0.06
15 34 4.5 3.45 ± 1.56 1.43 ± 0.25 0.14
16 30 5.7 1.78 ± 0.41 1.94 ± 0.88 0.44
17 28 5.3 0.78 ± 0.16 1.77 ± 0.74 0.13
18 29 5.0 2.62 ± 0.37 1.33 ± 0.39 0.04
19 27 6.6 0.68 ± 0.40 0.93 ± 0.38 0.34
20 26 4.8 1.89 ± 0.45 1.07 ± 0.11 0.08
21 25 6.5 2.07 ± 0.76 1.11 ± 0.32 0.15
22 24 5.1 2.18 ± 0.75 0.91 ± 0.16 0.09
23 24 4.5 2.85 ± 1.31 2.96 ± 1.86 0.48
24 22 6.5 1.46 ± 0.22 1.02 ± 0.42 0.20
25 22 6.4 1.29 ± 0.23 1.11 ± 0.38 0.35
26 20 5.7 2.06 ± 1.21 1.87 ± 0.84 0.45
27 22 5.3 1.73 ± 0.66 1.16 ± 0.54 0.27
28 22 5.2 2.14 ± 0.98 1.51 ± 0.74 0.32
29 20 4.8 3.20 ± 1.19 1.13 ± 0.23 0.08
30 20 4.7 4.75 ± 1.94 1.45 ± 0.48 0.09
31 18 5.3 2.79 ± 0.45 1.09 ± 0.51 0.03
32 14 6.0 2.43 ± 0.61 1.48 ± 0.90 0.22
33 17 4.9 1.49 ± 0.50 1.25 ± 0.53 0.38
34 17 4.8 1.86 ± 0.69 0.90 ± 0.23 0.13
35 17 4.4 2.65 ± 1.00 0.98 ± 0.20 0.09
a

32P incorporation into spots of 2-D gels was quantified by PhosphorImager and normalized to the protein amount of actin in each gel. Phosphorylation changes of proteins are expressed as the fold change in 32P incorporation after cAMP stimulation versus before stimulation. Values are means ± standard errors from three experiments. Only proteins that were phosphorylated in three independent experiments were quantified.