TABLE 2.
Distribution of hrHPV and probably hrHPV types in cervicovaginal self-obtained samples and endocervical brush samples from women who showed hrHPV PCR-EIA positivity in both samples
hrHPV type | Infection frequencya
|
|
---|---|---|
Self-obtained samples | Endocervical brush samples | |
16 | 23 | 26 |
18 | 8 | 8 |
26 | 0 | 0 |
31 | 12 | 14 |
33 | 2 | 2 |
35 | 2 | 1 |
39 | 5 | 5 |
45 | 0 | 0 |
51 | 3 | 3 |
52 | 1 | 1 |
53 | 3 | 3 |
56 | 7 | 8 |
58 | 2 | 1 |
59 | 1 | 0 |
66 | 3 | 2 |
67b | 3 | 3 |
68 | 2 | 2 |
73 | 0 | 0 |
82 | 0 | 0 |
Xc | 2 | 2 |
Multiple hrHPV infections | 16 | 16 |
Frequencies indicated here include presence of types both in single and multiple infections. Values are numbers of samples.
HPV67 risk factor is at present unknown. It is classified here as high risk because of homology with alpha-9 HPV types (such as HPV16).
HPVX means that the hrHPV cocktail EIA was positive but no signal was obtained with any of the separate probes in the RLB analysis.