TABLE 4.
Recovery of 2 ×105 plasmid DNA copies spiked into human and canine fecal dilutions
Fecal source | Sample fecal concn (mg/liter) | Measured no. of recovered DNA copies | % PCR amplification of plasmid relative to controla |
---|---|---|---|
Human | 5,000 | 2.6 (±0.02) × 105 | 91 |
1,000 | 3.3 (±1.0) × 105 | 116 | |
200 | 2.7 (±0.2) × 105 | 96 | |
40 | 3.7 (±0.8) × 105 | 124 (±29) | |
8 | 2.9 (±0.1) × 105 | 99 (±4.5) | |
1.6 | 2.6 (±0.5) × 105 | 89 (±16) | |
0.32 | 2.9 (±0.4) × 105 | 99 (±13) | |
Canine | 10,000 | 2.2 (±0.4) × 105 | 75 (±15) |
2,000 | 3.6 (±0.8) × 105 | 123 (±26) | |
400 | 2.9 (±0.1) × 105 | 100 (±4.1) | |
80 | 2.7 (±0.2) × 105 | 91 (±8.3) | |
16 | 2.3 (±0.6) × 105 | 78 (±20) | |
3.2 | 2.4 (±0.4) × 105 | 82 (±14) | |
0.64 | 2.6 (±0.4) × 105 | 88 (±15) | |
Control | 0 | 2.8 (±0.1) × 105 | 100 |
Percent PCR amplification = (measured no. of copies in the presence of feces/measured no. of copies in the control) × 100.