Skip to main content
. 2006 Jun;72(6):4214–4224. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01036-05

TABLE 5.

E. coli concentrations, fecal concentrations, and percentages of bovine-associated and human-associated fecal concentrations in watersheds with different land use patterns

Land use type Site name (flow) E. coli concna (CFU/100 ml) Real-time PCR assay result (mg/liter) for:
% Spiked plasmid recoveryb % Recoveryc that was
AllBac BoBac HuBac Attributable to bovines Attributable to humans
Pasture/rural housing NS-1 (low flow) 267 17.4 ± 8.5 2.3 ± 1.5 0.8 ± 0.7 77 ± 18 13 4
NS-1 (high flow) 17,800 100 ± 7.6 15.4 ± 8.9 19 ± 8.7 97 ± 1 15 19
NS-3 (low flow) 60 5.6 ± 3.7 2.3 ± 3.1 1.2 ± 0.5 67 ± 19 41 21
NS-3 (high flow) 39,600 452 ± 68 144 ± 33 37 ± 7.2 91 ± 4 32 8
Urban U2 (low flow) 1,967 70.9 ± 21 2.1 ± 1.5 14 ± 4.0 85 ± 42 3 21
Resort/forest R07 (low flow) 600 17.7 ± 6.3 NDd 0.6 ± 0.3 63 ± 41 ND 3
R20 (low flow) 3,160 231 ± 1.7 1.2 ± 1.8 243 ± 62 113 ± 35 0.5 105
a

Single-sample E. coli concentration.

b

Percent recovery = (sample spiked with 2.5 × 105 copies − measured copies in unspiked sample)/(2.5 × 105) × 100. The percent recovery was determined for each assay and then averaged.

c

Percent total = [concentration (mg/liter) of BoBac or HuBac/concentration (mg/liter) of AllBac] × 100.

d

ND, not detected in this sample.