Skip to main content
. 2003 Jan;47(1):148–153. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.1.148-153.2003

TABLE 3.

Comparison of susceptibility rates of various species of the B. fragilis group isolated from blood

Antimicrobial agent % S value(s)a
B. fragilis B. thetaiotaomicron B. distasonis B. ovatus B. vulgatus B. uniformis B. caccae
Penicillin G 0 0 0 0 0 0 4, 32∗
Piperacillin 80 76 64 74 45 32, 32, 32∗ NT
Ticarcillin 69 68 16, 256 39 44 256 NT
Piperacillin-tazobactam 99.1 100 100 100 100 0.12, 0.25∗ 0.5, 2∗
Ticarcillin-clavulanate 99.2 100 1, 32, 128, 128 77 100 8∗ NT
Ampicillin-sulbactam 95 98 77 84 88 1, 2, 2, 2∗ 1, 16∗
Cefotaxime 74 39 36 46 50 32, 64, 64∗ NT
Ceftriaxone 69 8 17 11 0 NT NT
Cefoxitin 90 70 53 88 69 1, 2, 16, 64∗ 4, 32∗
Cefotetan 87 19 21 26 50 64, 128∗ NT
Cefmetazole 85 6 33 20 8, 16∗ 128∗ NT
Ceftizoxime 81 76 64 81 56 32, 32∗ NT
Imipenem 99.2 100 100 100 100 100 0.03, 0.25∗
Meropenem 96 100 100 100 100 0.06, 0.12, 0.25∗ 0.12, 2∗
Ertapenem 94 100 60 88 100 0.06, 0.12∗ 0.25, 2∗
Trovafloxacin 100 92 100 90 92 0.03, 0.5∗ 0.12, 2∗
Clindamycin 89 63 53 48 73 60 16, 16∗
Metronidazole 100 100 100 100 100 100 0.25, 0.5∗
a

∗, when four or fewer isolates were tested, the individual MICs are listed. NT, not tested.