Skip to main content
. 2006 Jul;141(3):1035–1044. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.079384

Table II.

Summary of QTL affecting the traits measured in the Bay-0 × Shahdara RIL population

QTL Cluster QTLa Chromosome Markerb Positionc LOD Score R2d Additivee
HLD-1 1-F5I14 65.0 2.7 7 +
IRA-1 FTIR 1,434 1-F5I14 70.1 3.3 13 +
FTIR 1,639 1-MSAT1.13 72.3 2.5 9 +
FTIR 1,060 1-MSAT1.13 74.5 2.4 12
FTIR 1,049 1-MSAT1.13 74.9 2.4 13
FTIR 1,041 1-MSAT1.13 74.9 2.3 12
FTIR 1,473 1-MSAT1.13 77.2 2.4 13 +
FTIR1 677 1-MSAT1.13 77.2 3.0 13 +
XGM-1 XXFG 1-MSAT1.13 78.0 2.7 11
XXLG-1 1-MSAT1.13 78.3 3.1 11 +
XXLG/XXFG-1 1-MSAT1.13 78.7 4.5 15 +
ARH-1 2-MSAT2.38 25.8 3.0 5 +
IRA-2 FTIR 1,496 2-MSAT2.36 34.3 3.6 13
FTIR 1,157 2-MSAT2.41 35.3 2.3 9 +
FTIR 1,554 2-MSAT2.41 36.8 3.1 12
FTIR 1,677-2 2-MSAT2.41 37.3 3.5 14
FTIR 1,639-2 2-MSAT2.41 38.5 3.2 13
HLD-2 3-MSAT3.32 45.7 4.2 12 +
HLD-3 3-MSAT3.18 62.5 2.7 9 +
XGM-2 XXLG-2 4-MSAT4.9 65.6 4.3 16
XXFG Ac-1 4-MSAT4.9 65.9 3.2 12 +
Ac-1 4-MSAT4.9 68.1 3.3 10 +
XXLG/XXFG-2 4-MSAT4.9 69.7 2.7 7
XLFG-1 4-MSAT4.9 69.7 2.3 6 +
XGM-4 Ac-2 5-NGA249 8.2 2.9 10 +
XXFG Ac-2 5-NGA249 8.6 2.6 10 +
ARH-2 5-NGA249 12.4 4.6 12 +
HLD-4 5-MSAT5.14 18.2 3.5 9
ARH-3 5-MSAT5.12 70.9 18.5 51 +
XGM-3 XLFG Ac 5-MSAT5.12 73.9 5.0 16 +
Ac-3 5-MSAT5.12 74.9 4.0 11 +
XLFG ± Ac 5-MSAT5.12 75.1 4.2 13 +
XLFG-2 5-MSAT5.12 76.4 2.5 8 +
a

The name given to a local LOD-score peak includes the trait name and a suffix, with an order number, if necessary.

b

The corresponding marker was used in CIM detection and for ANOVA.

c

The position of the QTL is expressed in centiMorgans with respect to the first marker of the chromosome.

d

Percentage of variance accounted for by the QTL.

e

The sign of the allelic effect is calculated as the mean effect of replacing both Shahdara alleles by Bay-0 alleles at the QTL. Thus, + indicates that the Bay-0 allele increases the trait value.