Skip to main content
. 2005 May;20(5):452–459. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40057.x

Table 4.

Linear Regression Models with Health Status Scales Predicting SOSQ Humanistic Scores

Unadjusted* Adjusted
Health Status Scales β 95% CI β 95% CI β§
Angina questionnaire (N=7,353)
 Physical limitation 1.37 (1.15 to 1.60) −0.02 (−0.34 to 0.31) −0.002
 Angina frequency 1.11 (0.87 to 1.33) −0.47 (−0.82 to−0.12) −0.05
 Angina stability 1.04 (0.83 to 1.25) 0.20 (−0.10 to 0.46) 0.02
 Disease perception 2.33 (2.11 to 2.55) 1.71 (1.34 to 2.07) 0.18
Obstructive lung disease questionnaire (N=4,418)
 Physical function 0.90 (0.60 to 1.20) −0.53 (−1.02 to−0.05) −0.05
 Emotional function 1.51 (1.22 to 1.80) 0.41 (−0.20 to 1.01) 0.04
 Coping skills 1.88 (1.57 to 2.19) 1.14 (0.56 to 1.72) 0.11
Diabetes questionnaire (N=4,367)
 Diabetic complications −0.49 (−0.69 to−0.29) −0.06 (−0.29 to 0.17) −0.01
 Symptom burden 1.64 (1.33 to 1.95) 0.33 (−0.10 to 0.75) 0.03
 Self-care 0.84 (0.58 to 1.10) −0.26 (−0.62 to 0.09) −0.03
 Glucose control 0.49 (0.25 to 0.72) −0.27 (−0.55 to 0.02) −0.03
 Emotional burden 2.47 (2.15 to 2.79) 1.43 (1.43 to 1.84) 0.13
 Education received 3.03 (2.75 to 3.31) 2.73 (2.35 to 3.11) 0.28
*

A separate model was created for each health status subscale within each disease category.

One model was created for each disease category. The 3 models are adjusted for all other disease-specific subscales, comorbidity, age, gender, race, marital status, education, income, employment, VA clinic site, length of care, non-VA care, recent clinic visit, and continuity of care.

Unstandardized coefficients for each 10-point change in health status score.

§

Standardized coefficients.

SOSQ, Seattle Outpatient Satisfaction Questionnaire; β, linear regression coefficient; CI, confidence interval.