Skip to main content
. 2005 May;20(5):444–447. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0083.x

Table 1.

LACRC Recruitment Methods and Characteristics of Study Samples (N=1,170)

Study Participation Rates Sources Recruitment Methods Consent Type Country of Origin Gender Education (≤High School) Age, y
Posters Flyers Radio Referral2 Incentive
Cancer prevention priorities (N=88) 93% Clinic, community sites X X $50 Cash Written United States 8% Mexico 10% Central America 60% South America 16% Other 7% Male 56% 51% 13–60
RCT feasibility (N=79) 96% Clinic X Verbal N/D Female 100% N/D 36–91
Breast cancer prevention* (N=450) 95% Clinic X X X $15 Gift card Written Central America 51.42% South America 27.36% Other 21.22% Female 100% 70% 33–81
Latina trust (N=178) 95% Clinic, community sites X X X $10 Gift card Verbal Central America 31% South America 57% North America 8% Other 4% Female 100% 55% 21–90
Tobacco use (N=305) 97% Clinic and ancillary services, health fair, community sites X X X X $10 Gift card Written United States 2.3% Mexico 9.2% Central America Caribbean 51.5% South America 30.9% Other 5.25% Male 65% 66% 18–76
Colorectal screening (N=70) 98% Clinic, food program, community sites, female focus groups. X X X X $50 Cash Written Mexico 2% Central America 39% South America 55% Other 2% Male 28% 43% 50–80
*

Combined two studies of breast cancer risk and STAR enrollment intervention from family members, or social network.

LACRC, Latin American Cancer Research Coalition; N/D, not determined; RCT, randomized clinical trial; STAR, Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene.