Skip to main content
. 2005 Nov;20(11):1001–1007. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00189.x

Table 2.

Physicians' Report of Management Strategies Employed, Satisfaction, and Effectiveness During the Visit

Unadjusted Adjusted*
Intervention (%) Control (%) Odds Ratio (95% CI) P Value Intervention (%) Control (%) Odds Ratio (95% CI) P Value
Management intensive 21 8 3.2 (1.1 to 9.8) .04 20 7 4.7 (1.4 to 16.0) .01
Physician strategies employed
 Involved family members or friends 25 16 1.7 (1.0 to 2.9) .04 27 17 1.9 (1.0 to 3.5) .04
 Referred to a nutritionist 13 5 2.9 (0.8 to 10.0) .09 11 3 4.0 (1.0 to 15.6) .05
 Used pictures or diagrams 11 5 2.4 (0.5 to 12.7) .30 8 1 7.9 (0.9 to 74.7) .07
 Referred to a diabetes educator 26 29 0.8 (0.4 to 1.8) .60 28 31 0.9 (0.4 to 1.9) .60
 Reviewed understanding of medications 89 87 1.3 (0.5 to 3.0) .60 92 90 1.3 (0.5 to 3.5) .60
 Spent time teaching about diabetes 66 65 1.1 (0.5 to 2.1) .8 69 63 1.3 (0.6 to 2.8) .5
Satisfied with visit 81 93 0.3 (0.1 to 0.8) .01 82 96 0.2 (0.1 to 0.5) <.001
Felt effective during visit 38 53 0.5 (0.3 to 1.2) .10 34 50 0.5 (0.2 to 1.2) .10

Odds ratios are for the intervention group, compared to the control group. All values account for clustering within physicians.

*

Adjusted for patient language, gender, years with primary care provider, and HL score.

Management intensive physicians employed >3 management strategies.

HL, health literacy; CI, confidence interval.