Table 3.
Patient Outcomes
n | Unadjusted | Adjusted | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intervention | Control | P Value | Intervention | Control | P Value | ||
Self-efficacy score (mean) | 160 | 12.6 | 12.9 | .60 | 12.6 | 12.6 | .61 |
Feel HL screening is useful (n, %)* | 160 | 81 (96) | 69 (97) | .77 | — | — | — |
n | Intervention | Control | Difference in Change, 95% CI, P Value | Intervention | Control | Difference in Change, 95% CI, P Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Change in % HbA1c (mean) | 157 | −0.21 | 0.05 | −0.26, −0.73 to 0.20, .26 | −0.10 | 0.17 | −0.27, −0.80 to 0.27, .32 |
Too few patients felt that HL screening was not useful to estimate adjusted proportions.
HL, health literacy; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; CI, confidence interval.