Skip to main content
. 2004 May;19(5 Pt 2):534–539. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30144.x

Table 3.

Comparison of Pre- and Postintervention Responses to the Learning Outcomes Questionnaire

Agreement*
Item Pretest Posttest P Value Effect Size
1. Part of a physician's duty is to help patients change their unhealthy and risky behaviors. 1.9 ± 1.2 1.4 ± 0.8 .004 0.50
2. Physicians can help many patients change their unhealthy and risky behaviors. 2.6 ± 1.0 2.1 ± 1.2 .006 0.45
3. Physicians should expect their patients to have relapses after changing their behaviors. 3.1 ± 1.7 1.8 ± 1.3 .000 0.87
4. Physicians who have provided complete information on treatments have fulfilled their obligation, even if patients don’t follow the advice. 3.2 ± 1.7 3.5 ± 1.8 .367
Patients frequently do not change unhealthy or risky behaviors, despite advice and information provided by concerned physicians, because…
5. they don’t care about their health. 3.2 ± 1.5 5.5 ± 1.4 .000 1.6
6. they lack self-discipline. 3.4 ± 1.6 4.5 ± 1.7 .000 0.67
7. they are focused on other priorities. 2.6 ± 1.4 2.8 ± 1.4 .303
8. they lack sufficient information about health effects and/or risks. 3.6 ± 1.5 4.0 ± 1.7 .125
9. they lack intelligence. 5.7 ± 1.4 6.0 ± 1.3 .287
10. they don’t try hard enough. 5.5 ± 1.5 4.9 ± 1.6 .031 0.39
11. they don’t believe they can change. 2.7 ± 1.4 2.3 ± 1.1 .020 0.32
12. their physicians lack skills in promoting behavior change. 3.6 ± 1.3 3.1 ± 1.4 .016 0.37
13. I feel knowledgeable about Prochaska and DiClemente's stages of readiness for change. 6.3 ± 1.4 1.9 ± 1.0 .000 2.8
14. I feel that I am able to conduct an interview to assess a patient's readiness to change unhealthy or risky behavior, using the Prochaska and DiClemente model. 6.3 ± 1.4 2.0 ± 1.0 .000 3.6
15. I feel I know which motivational interviewing techniques should be applied at particular stages of readiness to change. 2.6 ± 2.1 1.9 ± 0.8 .006 0.49
16. I feel able to use motivational interviewing techniques in helping actual patients change their unhealthy and risky behaviors. 2.8 ± 1.9 2.0 ± 0.9 .001 0.57
Number of Responses Judged Adherent to the TIBS Model P Value Effect Size
17. Case of patient in precontemplation. 0.7 ± 0.8 2.1 ± 1.0 < .0001 1.6
18. Case of patient in determination. 1.2 ± 1.0 2.2 ± 0.9 < .0001 1.1
*

For items 1 to 16, 1 = strongly agree; 4 = neutral or uncertain; 7 = strongly disagree.

P values from paired t tests comparing pretest and posttest responses for 69 students. TIBS, Tobacco Intervention Basic Skills curriculum.