Skip to main content
. 2004 Dec;19(12):1167–1174. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30425.x

Table 2.

Baseline, 6-Month, and Adjusted 6-Month PRP Measures Completed by Condition

Variable/Condition Primary Outcomes Baseline Mean or % 6-Month Unadjusted Mean or % 6-Month Adjusted* Mean or % Significance Level* (P Value)
Lab procedures completed, n
  Intervention 3.03 (0.29) 3.40 (0.29) 3.39 0.001
  Control 3.00 (0.42) 3.10 (0.42) 3.11
 Blood pressure, %
  Intervention 98.1 98.2 99.2
  Control 98.3 99.6 99.6
 Dilated eye exam, %
  Intervention 67.7 78.3 76.7
  Control 59.5 66.9 68.2
 Foot exam, %
  Intervention 74.4 87.4 87.8
  Control 76.7 79.4 79.1
 Microalbumin, %
  Intervention 61.9 75.0 76.1
  Control 65.3 68.3 67.4
Patient-centered activities completed, n
  Intervention 3.00 (0.41) 3.65 (0.21) 3.63 < 0.001
  Control 2.90 (0.34) 3.17 (0.45) 3.19
 Self-management: goal setting, %
  Intervention 59.8 91.6 91.6
  Control 58.3 77.0 76.9
 Medical nutrition treatment, %
  Intervention 55.0 81.4 81.4
  Control 49.0 67.6 67.6
 Self-monitoring blood glucose, %
  Intervention 88.5 92.9 92.0
  Control 84.6 84.0 84.9
 Patient satisfaction, %
  Intervention 96.6 99.0 99.2
  Control 96.5 96.4 96.2
Other outcomes, %
 Quality of life (PAID-2)
  Intervention 30.28 (4.22) 29.72 (4.90) 29.12 (0.74) 0.747
  Control 28.54 (5.02) 26.78 (4.35) 27.30 (0.70)
With major depression, %
 (10 or higher on PHQ-9)
  Intervention 18.6 17.4 15.0 0.717
  Control 13.1 11.4 13.4

Standard deviations are in parentheses for T1 and unadjusted T2 scores.

*

Significance levels are P values from ANCOVA results on adjusted 6-month values (adjusted for age and number of comorbid conditions, and baseline values on the dependent variable) and accounting for clustering within physicians.

Lower scores indicate better quality of life.

Tests for significance were run on continuous PHQ scores.

PRP, Physician Recognition Program; PAID-2, Problem Areas in Diabetes 2 scale; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire.