Skip to main content
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1987 Nov;206(5):666–673. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198711000-00019

PTFE grafts for hemodialysis access. Techniques for insertion and management of complications.

S Raju 1
PMCID: PMC1493291  PMID: 3675026

Abstract

In a series of 602 procedures, over 90% of primary forearm insertions of PTFE grafts between the radial artery and a cubital vein were possible. Thrombosis of the graft, which was invariably due to venous outflow obstruction, was the most common complication encountered. Revision of the venous anastomosis was not necessary in about one-third of the thrombosed grafts if a size 3 coronary dilator could be passed and the augmentation test was satisfactory. For revisions, creation of a new venous anastomosis using a jump graft was preferred over patch angioplasty or venous endarterectomy. Crossing the elbow for this purpose did not adversely affect graft patency. The incidence of aneurysm formation and infection was 16% and 35%, respectively. Infections involving the graft were managed by drainage, antibiotics, and bypass of the infected portion. Immediate bypass and delayed bypass were equally effective. About one-half of the infected grafts were salvaged by these techniques. The most common organism was Staphylococcus aureus. With a combination of the techniques outlined above, the service life of individual PTFE grafts can be extended. Two-year access patency in this series was 77%.

Full text

PDF
671

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bhat D. J., Tellis V. A., Kohlberg W. I., Driscoll B., Veith F. J. Management of sepsis involving expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts for hemodialysis access. Surgery. 1980 Apr;87(4):445–450. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Connolly J. E., Brownell D. A., Levine E. F., McCart P. M. Complications of renal dialysis access procedures. Arch Surg. 1984 Nov;119(11):1325–1328. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1984.01390230091023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jenkins A. M., Buist T. A., Glover S. D. Medium-term follow-up of forty autogenous vein and forty polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex) grafts for vascular access. Surgery. 1980 Nov;88(5):667–672. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Louridas G., Botha J. R., Levien L., Milne F. J., Meyers A. M., Myburgh J. A. Vascular access for haemodialysis--experience at Johannesburg Hospital. S Afr Med J. 1984 Oct 27;66(17):637–640. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mohaideen A. H., Tanchajja S., Avram M. M., Mainzer R. A. Arteriovenous access for hemodialysis: utilizing polytetrafluoroethylene grafts. N Y State J Med. 1980 Feb;80(2):190–195. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Munda R., First M. R., Alexander J. W., Linnemann C. C., Jr, Fidler J. P., Kittur D. Polytetrafluoroethylene graft survival in hemodialysis. JAMA. 1983 Jan 14;249(2):219–222. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Palder S. B., Kirkman R. L., Whittemore A. D., Hakim R. M., Lazarus J. M., Tilney N. L. Vascular access for hemodialysis. Patency rates and results of revision. Ann Surg. 1985 Aug;202(2):235–239. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198508000-00015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rapaport A., Noon G. P., McCollum C. H. Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts for haemodialysis in chronic renal failure: assessment of durability and function at three years. Aust N Z J Surg. 1981 Dec;51(6):562–566. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1981.tb05255.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Veith F. J., Wilson S. E., Hobson R. W., 2nd, Rosenthal J. J., Tellis V. A., Dagher F. J. Vascular access complications and new methods. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs. 1982;28:647–651. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Winsett O. E., Wolma F. J. Complications of vascular access for hemodialysis. South Med J. 1985 May;78(5):513–517. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198505000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES