Table 3.
Age Category (Y)† | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Satisfaction Measure* | 18–35 | 36–50 | 51–65 | 66–80 | >80 |
Physician care | 70.3 ± 25.9 | 74.9 ± 24.5 | 77.0 ± 22.7 | 75.5 ± 22.6 | 71.3 ± 23.1 |
Coordination of care | 70.0 ± 26.4 | 72.5 ± 26.1 | 74.3 ± 24.1 | 73.8 ± 23.3 | 69.7 ± 23.6 |
Nursing care | 68.1 ± 25.5 | 71.3 ± 25.6 | 73.4 ± 23.5 | 72.8 ± 22.7 | 68.8 ± 22.8 |
Discharge instructions | 66.4 ± 24.7 | 69.2 ± 24.0 | 71.1 ± 22.8 | 70.8 ± 22.3 | 68.1 ± 22.3 |
Information provided | 66.8 ± 26.7 | 69.6 ± 26.0 | 71.3 ± 24.4 | 70.0 ± 24.3 | 64.9 ± 25.0 |
Overall quality‡,§ | 65.9 | 70.2 | 71.3 | 69.3 | 63.5 |
Differences between age categories were significant, P < .001, ANOVA. In addition, for each of the scales, mean scores increased (P < .001) between patients 18–35 and 51–65 years, and then decreased (P < .001) between patients 51–65 and >80 years, Scheffe's procedure.
Mean score ±SD.
Percent of patients with rating of “excellent” or “very good.”
Differences between age categories were significant, P < .001. χ2 test. In addition, the proportion of patients with excellent rating increased (P < .001) between patients 18–35 and 51–65 years, and then decreased (P < .001) between patients 51–65 and >80 years. χ2 test for linear trend.