Table 1.
Items Assessed by Standardized Patients in the HIV Informed Consent Station
| Mean | SD | |
|---|---|---|
| Item* | ||
| “The student …” | ||
| 1. Spoke with me in a respectful manner. | 1.88 | 0.33 |
| 2. Attempted to establish rapport with me. | 1.72 | 0.52 |
| 3. Used language I could easily understand. | 1.91 | 0.33 |
| 4. Explained the reason(s) for the HIV test. | 1.95 | 0.22 |
| 5. Explained the procedure of the HIV test to me. | 1.48 | 0.83 |
| 6. Explained or explored the psychosocial risks of the HIV test to me. | 1.02 | 0.77 |
| 7. Explained the benefits of the HIV test to me. | 1.80 | 0.45 |
| 8. Explained alternatives to performing the HIV test at this time to me. | 1.53 | 0.68 |
| 9. Tried to make sure that I understood the information given to me about the HIV test. | 1.93 | 0.26 |
| 10. Listened carefully to any questions I had about the HIV test. | 1.93 | 0.30 |
| 11. Seemed to understand how I felt about the issues we discussed. | 1.77 | 0.53 |
| 12. Addressed my concerns about confidentiality. | 1.54 | 0.72 |
| 13. Explained how the HIV test results would be documented in my records. | 1.56 | 0.65 |
| 14. Explained who would have access to my HIV test results. | 1.60 | 0.57 |
| 15. Tried to make sure that I did not feel pressured to have the HIV test. | 1.86 | 0.34 |
| Global assessment item† | ||
| “I would return to this clinician.” | 3.52 | 0.96 |
0 = “no”; 1 = “sort of”; 2 = “yes.”
1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree.