Skip to main content
. 2003 Feb;18(2):128–137. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20524.x

Table 1.

Descriptive and Quantitative Data for Screening Studies

Number of Patients with Proximal Neoplasia/Total Number for Each Group (%)
First Author, Year of Study Mean Age, Y (Range) Study Design Definition of Distal Colon Size of Distal Polyp Studied Distal Polyp Required for Colonoscopy Total Number Distal Hyperplastic Polyps Distal Adenomas No Distal Polyps Miscellaneous Polyps
Achkar, 199015 56 (27 to 87) Retrospective Reach of 35- cm sigmoidoscope 9 mm or smaller Yes 172 21/72 (29) 23/69 (33) 4/31 (13)
Blue, 199149 59 (31 to 91) Retrospective Reach of 35- cm sigmoidoscope Yes 185 19/69 (26) 29/99 (29) 1/17 (6)
Brady, 199334 62 (50 to 81) Prospective Reach of 60-cm sigmoidoscope ≤5 mm No 162 6/42 (14) 31/78 (40) 5/42 (12)
Deal, 199148 — (43 to 80) Retrospective Distal 60 cm of colon Yes 211 26/75 (35) 42/115 (37)
Foutch, 199143 64 (≥50) Prospective Reach of 60-cm sigmoidoscope No 129 8/25 (32) 13/31 (42) 11/73 (15)
Lieberman, 19914 64 (50 to 76) Prospective Reach of 60-cm sigmoidoscope No 105 6/21 (29) 8/19 (42) 18/65 (28)
Nusko, 199647 59 (42 to 83) Retrospective Rectosigmoid Yes 304 10/65 (15) 86/239 (36)
Opelka, 199250 62 Prospective Reach of 60-cm sigmoidoscope ≤5 mm Yes 76 9/30 (30) 16/40 (40) 1/6 (17)
Rex, 199245 Prospective Rectosigmoid No 480 8/45 (18) 22/58 (38) 58/377 (15)
Stoltenberg, 199146 62 (52 to 72) Prospective Reach of 35-cm sigmoidoscope ≤5 mm Yes 100 12/56 (21) 11/41 (27)