Skip to main content
. 2003 Sep;18(9):755–763. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20833.x

Table 1.

Characteristics of Studies Included in Empirical Treatment Group

Participants Intervention
First Author, Year Published Design N Inclusion Criteria % EGD Findings PPI Arm PPI Arm H2RA Arm Placebo Arm Duration, Wk
Armstrong, 200141 R, DB 208 Significant heartburn for at least 6 mo, at least 4 episodes per wk 40 No erosions Pan 40 mg/d Niz 150 mg bid 4
37 Grade 1 (SM)
17 Grade 2 (SM)
6 Grade 3 (SM)
Grade 4 (SM)
Bardhan, 199945 R, DB 677 Moderate or severe heartburn for more than 2 d in each of the previous 2 wk 33 No mucosal breaks Ome 20 mg/d Ome 10 mg/d Ran 150 mg bid 2
28 Breaks <3mm
40 Breaks >3mm
Circumferential
Bate, 199742 R, DB 221 Heartburn predominant last mo, on at least 2 d last wk 47 No erosions Ome 20 mg/d Cim 400 mg qid 4
24 Isolated erosions
29 Confluent erosions
Esophageal ulcer
Hallerback, 199846 R, DB 423 At least 2 of the following: retrosternal burning pain, epigastric pain or fluid acid regurgitation but not persistent lower abdominal pain 67 No erosions Ran 150 mg bid Placebo 2
28 Grade 1 (SM)
4 Grade 2 (SM)
1 Grade 3 (SM)
Grade 4 (SM)
Hatlebakk, 199951 R, DB 320 Heartburn predominant for at least 3 mo, on at least 3 d a wk in the last 2 wks 47 No esophagitis Ome 20 mg/d Placebo 8
28 Grade A (LA)
26 Grade B (LA)
Grade C, D (LA)
Rush, 199544 R, DB 590 Heartburn at least 3 mo, on at least 4 d last wk 100 No EGD Ran 150 mg bid Placebo 6
Venables, 199743 R, DB 994 Heartburn predominant for at least 3 mo, on at least 2 d last wk 68 No erosions Ome 20 mg/d Ome 10 mg/d Ran 150 mg bid 4
32 Erosions
Ulcerations

R, randomized; DB, double-blinded; EGD, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (excluded groups are presented in italics), SM, Savory and Miller classification; LA, Los Angeles classification; pan, pantoprazole; ome, omeprazole; niz, nizatidine; ran, ranitidine; cim, cimetidine; bid, twice daily; qid, four times daily.