Skip to main content
. 2003 Sep;18(9):705–710. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20639.x

Table 1.

Characteristics of Participants in the Prospective Study of Promotion in Academia, 2000

Characteristics of Subjects Total Participants (N = 183) Clinician-Educators (N = 107) Clinician-Investigators (N = 63)
Demographic variables, freq. (%)
 Age ≤38 y 66 (37) 45 (43) 14 (23)*
 Female 64 (35) 32 (30) 27 (43)
 Minority race 37 (20) 15 (14) 19 (30)
Percent work time, mean ± SD
 Patient care without learners 27 ± 25 31 ± 22 14 ± 15*
 Percent research 24 ± 27 8 ± 9 55 ± 22*
 Attending medical learners in hospital 17 ± 16 22 ± 16 11 ± 11*
 Precepting medical learners in clinic 12 ± 13 15 ± 13 8 ± 11
 Administrative duties 12 ± 13 13 ± 13 8 ± 9
 Curriculum development 5 ± 7 7 ± 9 3 ± 4*
Professional background and training, freq. (%)
 Participated in research during medical school 107 (59) 50 (47) 46 (73)*
 Post-residency training (fellowship/other vs none) 145 (80) 76 (72) 60 (95)*
Preparing for promotion, freq. (%)
 In a “clinical” track 64 (36) 51 (49) 6 (10)*
 Track eligible for tenure 75 (44) 37 (36) 35 (59)
 Expectation of research publications for promotion 145 (79) 79 (75) 59 (98)*
 How often meet with chair/chief to discuss promotion
  More than yearly 69 (38) 34 (32) 32 (53)
  Every 1–2 y 70 (39) 49 (46) 18 (30)
  Never 41 (23) 24 (22) 11 (18)
 Aware of chair/chief's expectations for promotion 119 (67) 67 (63) 46 (77)
 Have seen written promotion guidelines 102 (56) 55 (51) 44 (72)

Thirteen respondents were unable to be characterized as clinician-educator or clinician-investigator, as discussed in the text.

*

P≤ .001.

P < .05.

Some tracks label faculty who are not primarily researchers with “Clinical” in the title, such as “Clinical Assistant Professor.”