Skip to main content
. 2003 Nov;18(11):948–959. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20928.x

Table 1.

Methodological Quality of All Framing Studies (N = 40)

Quality Category Quality Criterion Code Studies Meeting Criterion n (%)
1. Subject selection (N = 40)
  Consecutive selection 1a 7 (18)
  Representative target group 1b 14 (35)
2. Assignment
  Randomized 2a 25 (74)
  (parallel groups design, N = 34)
  Order of presentation randomized 2b 2 (33)
  (within-subjects design, N = 6)
3. Blinding (N = 40)
  Research team unaware of allocation 3a 2 (5)
  Participants unaware of other frames/purpose of study 3b 2 (5)
4. Comparison frames (N = 40)
  No information control 4a 2 (5)
  Mixed frame* 4b 6 (15)
5. Comparability
  Comparison groups comparable or analyses adjusted 5a 12 (35)
  (parallel groups design, N = 34)
  Reported baseline characteristics 5b 6 (100)
  (within-subjects design, N = 6)
*

Both positively and negatively framed information presented together.