Skip to main content
. 2002 Feb;17(2):103–111. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10128.x

Table 4.

Physician's Reported Rationale for Overruling the Acute Treatment Depression Guidelines

Patient Physician Patient Age, Y (Gender) Clinical Rationale
1 A 68 (M) Myocardial infarction just prior to enrollment in study with continuing unstable angina. Hospitalized with a pulmonary embolus during acute phase treatment. (Had seen a psychiatrist in previous year, but wouldn't return)
2 A 36 (F) Rapidly accelerating systematic lupus erythematosis, type 1 diabetes, and new onset heart failure with multiple hospitalizations and medications
3 B 52 (F) Severe steroid-dependent asthma; multiple chronic medications including high doses of steroids
4 C 35 (F) Physician did not believe patient had major depression. Had recently lost husband and only son in an auto accident
5 D 74 (F) Rapid worsening heart failure with multiple hospitalizations for pulmonary edema
6 E 60 (M) AIDS with multiple complications and multiple medications
7 E 78 (F) Metastatic breast cancer, chronic pain, recently lost husband who had helped her manage complicated medication regimen
8 E 43 (F) Physician initially believed patient was not depressed. (By 6 months patient had completed a guideline-concordant course of antidepressant medication)
9 E 45 (F) Patient with multiple medications. Remained on starting dose of paroxetine; did not increase dose because both patient and physician satisfied with response
10 F 34 (M) Recent and rapid progression of HIV to AIDS with multiple medications
11 G 50 (F) Severe cirrhosis of liver, recurrent bleeding of esophageal varices, scheduled for portal-caval shunt during acute phase
12 H 28 (M) Recent hemicolectomy for Crohn's Disease, metastatic testicular cancer. (By 6 months, patient had received guideline-concordant courses of both antidepressant medication and psychotherapy.)