Table 3.
Comparison of Major GME Reform Proposals
Commonwealth Fund | MedPAC | Bipartisan Commission on the Future of Medicare | COGME | Medical Education Trust Fund (AAMC) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Major points | Calls for strong emphasis on social missions of teaching hospitals | Calls for improvement of case-mix measurement method to more accurately reflect illness severity/inpatient care cost relationship | Raises question of whether DME should be subject to appropriations process | Creates a GME fund that combines federal funding with all-payer funds | Amends Social Security Act to add new title (Title XXII) that would establish Medicare Education Trust Fund |
Urges that financing method should evenly distribute burden of payment | Acknowledges difficulty in differentiating IME costs between teaching and non-teaching hospitals, and so recommends that Congress continue current methodology | Calls for DME monies to be paid directly to program sponsors | |||
Recommends that financing should not contribute to regional oversupply or specialty imbalance among U.S. physicians | Recommends that developing workforce policy is not a role for Medicare | Would modify Medicare teaching physician rules to emphasize teaching physician's overall responsibility for patient care and to reduce importance of documentation | Calls for specific premium tax of 1.5% on health insurance premiums | ||
Urges refinement of DRG system | |||||
Uses “teaching hospital adjustment” in place of DME payment system | |||||
Funding mechanism | All-payer | Use of current funding mechanism (PPS system) | Use of current funding mechanism, but raises question of whether DME should be subject to appropriations process | All-payer | All-payer |
Intended to be budget-neutral and to improve accuracy of GME payments | |||||
Unique characteristics | Emphasis on social missions | Only proposal calling for elimination of DME payments and use of “teaching hospital adjustment” | Only proposal to discuss possibility of subjecting DME to appropriations process | Only proposal to recommend paying DME monies directly to program sponsors | Only proposal to call for legislation amending IRS code, establishing 1.5% premium tax on all health insurance premiums |
Site-neutral distribution of trust fund payments | |||||
Specific attention to safety net providers | Only proposal to recommend exploring funding IME and DSH payments outside of Medicare program | Only proposal to recommend modifying teaching physician rules to place additional emphasis on overall responsibility for patient care and less emphasis on documentation | |||
Unique level of influence due to standing of former Commission members in Congress | |||||
Potential to improve the current idiosyncratic variations across institutions in per resident payment amounts? | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes |
Does the proposal in question allow for recalibration of teaching costs to reflect year 2002 realities? | Yes | No | Unclear | Yes | Yes |
Authority over DME funds shifted to the professionals responsible for resident education? | No | No | No | No | No |
Potential to improve the current problem that resident positions are variably underfunded by year of training and specialty? | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | Yes |
DME payments tied to the institution's actual expenditures on resident education? | Unclear | No | Unclear | Yes | Unclear |
Potential to improve the current problem that DME monies are earned without any accountability for program outcomes? | No | No | Unclear | Yes | No |
GME, graduate medical education; MedPac, Medicare Payment Advisory Commission; COGME, Council on Graduate Medical Education; DRG, diagnosis-related group; DME, direct medical education; PPS, prospective payment system; IME, indirect medical education; DSH, disproportionate share hospital.