Table 3.
Intervention Firm | Control Firm | Total | P Value* | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rates of any alcohol-related discussion, n (%) | ||||
As a proportion of all taped visits | 22/27 (81.5) | 17/41 (41.5) | 39/68 (57.4) | .001 |
As a proportion of patients taped | 15/17 (88.2) | 14/30 (46.7) | 29/47 (61.7) | .005 |
Mean proportion of visits per provider† | — (82.4) | — (39.6) | — (52.2) | .026 |
Mean proportion of visits per patient per provider† | — (81.3) | — (38.4) | — (51.0) | .027 |
Rates of any alcohol-related advice, n (%) | ||||
As a proportion of all taped visits | 9/27 (33.3) | 5/41 (12.2) | 14/68 (20.6) | .035 |
As a proportion of patients taped | 7/17 (41.2) | 5/30 (16.6) | 12/47 (25.5) | .087 |
Mean proportion of visits per provider† | — (29.2) | — (20.8) | —(23.3) | .643 |
Mean proportion of visits per patient per provider† | — (30.3) | — (18.1) | — (21.8) | .510 |
Two-tailed χ2 or Permutation t test.
Five providers were in the Intervention firm; 12 were in the Control firm.