Skip to main content
. 2002 Dec;17(12):937–945. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.20389.x

Table 3.

Hypertensive Urgencies

Authors Patients Intervention Outcomes NNT AE* RR
Habib et al.,26 (Evidence 1b) DBP >120 mm Hg (n = 53) NCN PO 30 mg vs placebo Goal: DBP <100 mm Hg 1. NNT 2 (95% CI, 1 to 5) for NCN No increase AE in NCN group RR for placebo to achieve target BP compared to NCN, 0.45 (95% CI, 0.25 to 0.78)
Komsuoglu et al.,11 (Evidence 1b) DBP ≥120 mm Hg (n = 66) NIF PO 20 mg vs NCN PO 20 mg vs C PO 25 mg 1. DBP ≤110 mm Hg NIF vs NCN NNT 24 (95% CI, NNH 5 to NNT 9) No difference in adverse effects except NIF increased heart rate compared with other agents 1. RR for NIF vs NCN, 1.91 (95% CI, 0.19 to 19.63) P= .97
2. Adverse effects NCN vs CPL NNT 18 (95% CI, NNH 4 to NNT 9) 2. RR for NIF vs captopril, 0.87 (95% CI, 0.14 to 5.62)
NIF vs CPL NNT 77 (95% CI, NNH 5 to NNT 6)
Gonzalez et al.,20 (Evidence 1b) DBP 110 to 140 mm Hg (n = 36) LBL PO 100 mg vs LBL PO 200 mg vs LBL PO 300 mg DBP ≤100 mm Hg or 30 mm Hg reduction in DBP 1. 100 vs 200 mg: NNT 6 (95% CI, NNH 1 to NNT 4) No adverse events 1. RR for LBL 100 mg vs 200 mg dose, 1.2 (95% CI, 0.5 to 2.88)
2. 100 vs 300 mg: NNT 12 (95% CI, NNH 2 to NNT 3) 2. RR for LBL 100 mg vs 300 mg dose, 1.5 (95% CI, 0.56 to 4.0)
Sanchez et al.,25 (Evidence 1b) DBP ≥120 mm Hg (n = 29) LCN PO 4 mg vs NIF PO 20 mg 1. Decrease in DBP >25% of baseline at 8 and 24 hr NNT 2 (95% CI, 1 to 8) for LCN 1 Patient in NIF group had a stroke 30 min after the dose, blood pressure decreased from 210/125 mm Hg to 120/80 mm Hg RR for NIF compared to LCN to reach the target BP, 0.37 (95% CI, 0.15 to 0.92)
2. Adverse effects
Jaker et al.,12 (Evidence 1b) DBP ≥120 mm Hg (n = 51) NIF PO 20 mg vs CLN PO 0.1 mg repeated every hr 1. DBP ≤100 mm Hg NNT 2 (95% CI, 1 to 2) for NIF Significant increase in heart rate in NIF group, no clinical sequelae; 59% sedation in CLN patients RR for NIF compared to CLN to reach the target BP, 0.2 (95% CI, 0.03 to 1.57)
2. Adverse effects
Zeller et al.,13 (Evidence 1b) DBP 116 to 139 mm Hg (n = 15). 3 Different combinations of chlorthalidone and CLN Fall in DBP of 20 mm Hg or DBP <105 mm Hg No differences between groups 11 Patients had hypotension evenly distributed in 3 groups, no clinical sequelae No difference
Rutledge et al.,14 (Evidence 1b) DBP 100 to 114 mm Hg (n = 65). Moderate hypertension group (DBP 100 to 114): ENL 1.25 mg IV every 6 hr vs placebo; severe hypertension (DBP 115 to 130): ENL 1.25 mg IV every 6 hr vs FSM DBP <95 mm Hg NNT 4 (95% CI, NNH 1 to NNT 19) for ENL 2 Patients in severe hypertension stratum treated with ENL developed hypotension, had no clinical sequelae 1. RR for placebo compared to ENL to reach the target BP at 24 hr, 0.58 (95% CI, 0.33 to 1.04) and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.26 to 1.4) at 48 hr
2. RR for FSM compared to ENL to reach the target BP at 24 hr, 0.82 (95% CI, 0.5 to 1.33) and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.2 to 2.41)
Hirschl et al.,24 (Evidence 1b) SBP >200 mm Hg and/or DBP >110 mm Hg (n = 53) URP IV 25 mg, then 12.5 mg if no response vs NIF sublingual 10 mg, repeated if no response SBP<180 mm Hg or DBP <100 mm Hg NNT 5 (95% CI, 2 to 55) for URP No AE. RR for NIF compared to URP to achieve target BP, 0.12 (95% CI, 0.01 to 2.04)
Rohr et al.,15 (Evidence 2b) SBP 200 to 250 mm Hg or DBP 110 to 140 mm Hg (n = 161) NIF PO 10 mg vs NIT PO 5 mg Decrease of ≥20 mm Hg SBP and of ≥15 mm Hg DBP NNT 1,000 (95% CI, NNH 7 to NNT 7) for NIT No major AE 83% of patients had effective blood pressure control in 4 hr in both groups
McDonald et al.,16 (Evidence 2b) DBP ≥120 mm Hg (n = 20) NIF PO 10 mg repeated 2 times if necessary vs LBL PO 200 mg followed by 100 mg or 200 mg at 2 hr if necessary DBP ≤110 mm Hg NNT 6 (95% CI, NNH 2 to NNT 10) for NIF No AE RR for LBL to reach the target BP compared to NIF, 0.2 (95% CI, 0.01 to 3.71)
Panacek et al.,17 (Evidence 2b) DBP ≥120 mm Hg (n = 183). FNP 0.1 μg/kg/min vs NTP 0.1 μg/kg/min and titrated to target BP of DBP<140 mm Hg or maximum reduction of 40 mm Hg in DBP 1. Time to reach the initial goal induction DBP No significant difference in time to reach goal DBP: 1 hr, 25 min in FNP-treated group, vs 1 hr, 34 min in NTP-treated group (NS) 22 Patients (10 FNP, 12 NTP) withdrawn due to clinical events: hypotension in 5 FNP patients and 11 NTP patients (NS). None had clinical sequelae from the hypotension
2. BP reduction during 6- to 24-hr maintenance phase
3. Adverse effects
Pilmer et al.,18 (Evidence 1b) DBP ≥120 mm Hg (n = 33) FNP 0.1 μg/kg/min vs NTP 0.1 μg/kg/min and titrated to target BP of DBP 95 to 110 mm Hg or maximum reduction of 40 mm Hg in DBP 1. Time to reach the initial goal induction DBP 1. All patients reached goal DBP during initial 6-hr titration period 4 Patients (2 FNP, 2 NTP) withdrawn due to hypotension (NS). None had clinical sequelae from the hypotension NA
2. BP reduction during 6- to 24-hr maintenance phase 2. No significant difference in time to reach goal DBP: 1.5 ± 1.4 hr in FNP-treated group, vs 2 ± 2.5 hr in NTP-treated group (NS).
3. Adverse effects 3. Re-elevation in DBP 1 hr after NTP infusion termination (103 ± 1.8 mm Hg vs 111 ± 3.0 mm Hg) P < .03
Reisin and Huth,19 (Evidence 2b) DBP ≥120 mm Hg and <170 mm Hg (n = 18) FNP 0.1 μg/kg/min vs NTP 0.5 μg/kg/min and titrated to target BP of DBP <110 mm Hg if initial DBP 120 to 149 mm Hg or by at least 40 mm Hg if initial DBP was 150 to 190; after goal DBP achieved, maximum infusion rate maintained for at least 2 hr then titrated off over 2 hr 1. Compare the efficacy of FNP vs NTP in DBP reduction 1. All patients reached goal DBP by the end of the maintenance period No patients had hypotension due to FNP or NTP. 2 NTP patients had toxic thiocyanate levels but no clinical manifestations of toxicity NA
2. Adverse effects 2. No mention of any difference in time to reach goal DBP or re-elevation in DBP infusion termination
Hirschl et al.,9 (Evidence 2b) SBP >210 mm Hg or DBP >110 mm Hg or patients with DBP >100 mm Hg AND evidence of end-organ dysfunction (∼1:1 ratio of urgencies and emergencies) (n = 168) ENL 5 mg IV vs URP 25 mg IV or NIF 10 mg capsule SL or NIF 10 mg SL spray SBP <180 mm Hg and DBP <95 mm Hg and resolution of end-organ dysfunction in hypertensive emergencies NNT for URP compared to ENL and NIF 4 (95% CI, NNT 3 to NNT 6) 1 NIF patient had hypotension and a TIA RR for ENL/NIF to reach the goal BP compared to URP, 0.73 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.83)
Wallin et al.,22 (Evidence 1b) SBP >200 mm Hg or DBP >120 mm Hg; study included a mixture of urgency and emergency patients (n = 123) NCN IV 5.0 mg/hr with titration vs placebo SBP ≤160 mm Hg or DBP ≤110 mm Hg or decrease DBP ≥25 mm Hg NNT for NCN compared to placebo 1 (95% CI, 1 to 1) 7 NCN patients developed hypotension, 4 had to stop drug, 2 had dose decreased (no clinical sequelae) RR for placebo to reach goal BP compared to NCN, 0.01 (95% CI, 0.001 to 0.017)
*

Comparing adverse effects was difficult due to the inconsistent methods of reporting adverse effects among different studies. AEs, when documented, were included in Tables 2 Tables 3.

SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; TIA, transient ischemic attack; NNT, number needed to treat; NNT is the number of patients needed to treat in order to prevent 1 negative outcome; in the context of this study, the NNT is the number of patients needed to treat in order for 1 patient to achieve the target blood pressure; NNH, number needed to harm; NNH is the number of patients needed to treat in order to harm 1 patient inadvertently; in the context of this study, the NNH is the number of patients needed to treat in order for 1 patient to miss achieving the target blood pressure; RR, relative risk; AE, adverse effects; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; CLN, clonidine; FNP, fenoldopam; NTP, nitroprusside; NIT, nitrendipine; NIF, nifedipine; URP, urapidil; LCN, lacidipine; FSM, furosemide; ENL, enalaprilat; NCN, nicardipine; SL, sublingual; IM, intramuscular; NA, not applicable.