Skip to main content
. 2000 Mar;15(3):183–187. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.03189.x

Table 2.

Methodologic Quality Criteria Concordance Between Abstracts and Articles to Diagnose Trichomoniasis (N = 33)

Criteria Fulfilled and Reported, n(%)(95% confidence interval [95% CI])
Methodologic Criteria Abstract Full Article None Agreement Between Abstract and Article*κ (95% CI)
Prospective evaluation of consecutive patients 5 (15) 11 (33) 22 (67) 0.53
(6.7% to 31%) (20% to 50%) (50% to 80%) (0.22 to 0.83)
Test result did not influence decision to do  gold standard 17 (52) 26 (79) 6 (18) 0.32
(35% to 68%) (62% to 89%) (8.6% to 34%) (0.05 to 0.59)
Independent and blind comparison with gold standard 2 (6.1) 4 (12) 27 (82) −0.09
(1.7% to 20%) (4.8% to 27%) (66% to 91%) (−0.18 to 0)
Broad spectrum of patients used 2 (6.1) 14 (42) 19 (58) 0.16
(1.7% to 20%) (27% to 59%) (41% to 73%) (−0.04 to 0.37)
*

Values of κ reflect agreement that is slight (0 to 0.19), fair (0.2 to 0.39), moderate (0.4 to 0.59), substantial (0.6 to 0.79), and almost perfect (0.8 to 1). A negative κ reflects disagreement.