Skip to main content
. 2000 May;15(5):321–328. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.08030.x

Table 2.

Characteristics of the Study Population

Eligibility Group, n(%)
Characteristic Abnormal Screening Mammogram (N = 392) Clinical Breast Complaint (N = 187)
Age, y
 <50 179 (45.7) 114 (61.0)*
 ≥50 213 (54.3) 73 (39.0)
Race
 White 295 (76.0) 136 (72.7)
 African American 60 (15.5) 24 (12.8)
 Hispanic 16 (4.1) 17 (9.1)
 Other, nonwhite 17 (4.4) 10 (5.4)
Education
 High school or less 83 (21.6) 44 (23.8)
 Some college 190 (49.4) 96 (51.8)
 Beyond college 112 (29.1) 45 (24.3)
Payer
 Managed care 241 (62.3) 107 (57.2)
 Commercial 101 (26.1) 51 (27.3)
 Medicaid 11 (2.8) 7 (3.7)
 Medicare 18 (4.7) 15 (8.0)
 Uninsured 16 (4.1) 7 (3.7)
 Family history of breast cancer 102 (26.2) 54 (29.4)
Degree of worry about breast cancer prior to mammogram
 Not at all worried/a little worried 335 (85.5) 134 (71.7)*
 Very/somewhat worried 57 (14.5) 53 (28.3)
Radiologist's recommendation for further care based on index  mammogram
 Biopsy 51 (13.0) 19 (10.2)*
 Nonroutine follow-up mammogram (<12 mo) 115 (29.3) 11 (5.9)
 Routine or 12-mo follow-up 165 (42.1) 81 (43.3)
 Follow-up as clinically indicated 61 (15.6) 76 (40.6)
Diagnosed with breast cancer during the 6 mo following the  index mammogram 13 (3.3) 14 (7.5)
*

P,.005 for comparison between women with an abnormal mammogram and those with a clinical breast complaint.

Women in the abnormal mammogram group with the recommendation of routine follow-up were included in this study because of the performance of additional compression or magnification views, ultrasound, or other additional testing by the radiologist at the time of the index mammogram.

P <.05 for comparison between women with and abnormal mammogram and those with a clinical breast complaint.