Table 2.
Number in Agreement (%) | Adjusted Odds Ratio | 95% Confidence Interval | |
---|---|---|---|
Acceptance of first-contact care† | |||
Age‡ | |||
<60 | 195 (70) | 1.0 | |
≥60 | 106 (91) | 4.3 | 2.0 to 9.3 |
Relationship with family physician‡ | |||
Moderate | 83 (61) | 1.0 | |
Very good | 218 (85) | 2.7 | 1.6 to 4.8 |
Insurance status‡ | |||
Private | 24 (59) | 1.0 | |
Sickness fund | 274 (79) | 2.4 | 1.2 to 5.2 |
Gender‡ | |||
Female | 158 (74) | 1.0 | |
Male | 143 (79) | 2.2 | 1.3 to 3.8 |
Competence of the family physician‡ | |||
Moderate | 71 (61) | 1.0 | |
Very good | 230 (82) | 2.0 | 1.1 to 3.5 |
Acceptance of first-contact care, if combinedwith financial incentives† | |||
Insurance status‡ | |||
Private | 22 (54) | 1.0 | |
Sickness fund | 277 (80) | 3.1 | 1.6 to 6.1 |
Family physican's professional competence‡ | |||
Moderate | 78 (67) | 1.0 | |
Very good | 225 (81) | 1.9 | 1.2 to 3.2 |
Acceptance of continuing care from thesame doctor for at least 1 y† | |||
Relationship with family physician‡ | |||
Moderate | 31 (23) | 1.0 | |
Very good | 116 (45) | 2.1 | 1.2 to 3.4 |
Family physician's professional competence‡ | |||
Moderate | 26 (22) | 1.0 | |
Very good | 121 (43) | 2.0 | 1.2 to 3.4 |
Age‡ | |||
<60 | 90 (32) | 1.0 | |
≥ 60 years | 57 (49) | 1.6 | 1.0 to 2.5 |
The following variables were included: age, sex, children, frequency of consultation, insurance status, satisfaction with the family physician (general satisfaction, competence, relationship, coordination of care), number of inhabitants, physician to population ratio, political region.
Response variables.
Significant covariables.