Table 2.
Key Strategies for Improving Care for Low Back Pain*
| Preoffice Visit |
| ♦ Public service announcements, newsletters, or standardized educational material available to patients prior to acute episode to minimize expectations of x-rays, imaging, and bed rest (1) |
| ♦ Dedicated phone number for access to triage nurse or other provider (6) |
| – With patient agreement, an informative wait inserted before appointment is made |
| – Recommended self-management techniques and symptom relief offered to patient |
| – Patient provided with information on usual course of treatment prior to visit |
| At the Time of Care |
| ♦ Physician uses patient history and brief physical examination to rule out serious underlying disease (9) |
| ♦ Imaging and surgical referrals made only when appropriate: |
| – Number of views for plain x-rays is limited by protocol (e.g., eliminating obliques and coned lateral) (4) |
| – Informative wait before ordering tests or making referral (6) |
| – Telephone consultations with surgical and nonsurgical specialists readily available to primary care physician (6) |
| – Imaging and referral utilization data provided and reviewed with physician, including comparisons with peers or with guidelines (13) |
| – New options to refer appropriate patients to nonsurgical specialists: spine center, physical therapist, physiatrist, support/educational group or other sources for patients who do not improve within 4-6 weeks, yet have no surgical indications (1) |
| ♦ Patient interaction guides (script, checkoff list) and standardized patient educational material to counsel patient on recommended course of treatment and self-management techniques (6) |
| ♦ “Outlier” rates of imaging or referral used to identify clinics or physicians for targeted intervention (1) |
| ♦ Decision aids (laminated cards, computer reminders, check lists) to reinforce indications for imaging or surgical consultation (4) |
| ♦ “Academic detailing” (1-on-1 advising with eye-catching handouts) to introduce key guidelines, provide rationale, and references (5) |
| ♦ Influential peers involved in developing or adapting guidelines, decision aids, patient education materials, and detailing materials (11) |
| ♦ Multidisciplinary review conference for planned surgical cases (1) |
| To Accelerate Return to Work |
| Providers and employers |
| ♦ Agree on standard treatment protocols, reporting forms, and return-to-work procedures (4) |
| ♦ Consider detailing sheet to educate patients and employers (0) |
| ♦ Identify key points of contact at both physician's office and corporate site (4) |
| Employers |
| ♦ Institute transitional return-to-work policies and provide flexibility in job assignments (2) |
| ♦ Provide time during day for recommended exercise and rehabilitation (0) |
| ♦ Call patients to express concern, enthusiasm for early return to job (0) |
| Providers |
| ♦ Reduce prescriptions for bed rest and time off (10) |
| ♦ Avoid unnecessary x-rays and imaging (8) |
| ♦ Prescribe return to normal activities, appropriate exercise (part of patient education efforts) |
| ♦ Visit employers to build communication and provide education (1) |
Approximate number of plans attempting each strategy is shown in parentheses.