TABLE 1.
Patient no. | Age (yr) | HIV-1 RNA quantitative detectionc by:
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cervicovaginal washing procedure (log HIV RNA copies/ml)a | Swabbing procedure (log HIV RNA copies/μg of total RNA)b
|
||||
Endocervix | Vaginal wall | Vaginal fornix | |||
1 | 18 | <1.69 | 1.491 | <1.1 | <1.1 |
2 | 24 | <1.69 | <1.1 | <1.1 | <1.1 |
3 | 25 | 1.924 | 1.447 | 1.255 | 3.554 |
4 | 20 | 3.468 | 1.613 | 3.973 | 4.014 |
5 | 31 | 3.279 | 2.1 | 3.358 | 3.175 |
6 | 28 | 3.326 | 3.122 | 3.492 | 3.556 |
7 | 25 | 4.348 | 2.255 | 1.929 | 3.561 |
8 | 28 | 3.785 | 2.32 | 1.875 | 2.928 |
9 | 23 | 2.881 | 2.818 | 1.322 | 1.462 |
10 | 32 | 5.792 | 3.127 | 3.908 | 2.663 |
11 | 20 | <1.69 | <1.1 | <1.1 | <1.1 |
12 | 30 | 5.045 | 2.238 | 1.633 | 3.568 |
13 | 25 | 2.716 | 2.481 | 2.176 | 3.122 |
14 | 24 | 5.456 | 2.838 | 1.301 | 2.176 |
15 | 24 | 5.173 | 3.389 | 1.756 | 3.538 |
16 | 30 | <1.69 | 1.973 | <1.1 | 3.447 |
17 | 27 | 3.21 | 1.477 | 1.826 | 2.897 |
18 | 26 | 3.459 | 1.732 | 1.924 | <1.1 |
19 | 20 | 3.609 | 1.491 | 3.289 | 3.312 |
20 | 21 | <1.69 | <1.1 | <1.1 | <1.08 |
21 | 30 | 3.875 | 1.613 | 1.633 | 2.382 |
22 | 22 | 4.565 | 2.843 | 2.364 | <1.1 |
23 | 25 | <1.69 | <1.1 | <1.1 | <1.1 |
24 | 29 | 4.388 | 2.188 | <1.1 | <1.1 |
25 | 23 | 3.56 | 1.892 | 3.066 | 3.498 |
Mean ± SD | 3.191 ± 1.53 | 2.018 ± 0.72 | 1.963 ± 0.99 | 2.434 ± 1.13 |
Threshold of detection, 50 copies of viral RNA (1.69 log HIV RNA copies) per ml. The data are given per milliliter of vaginal lavage without taking into account the dilution factor introduced by the vaginal washing procedure (1:10).
A threshold of 12.5 copies of HIV RNA per μg of total RNA (1.1 log HIV RNA copies/μg of total RNA) was estimated in swab samples.
An arbitrary value of 10 HIV-1 RNA copies was used when HIV RNA was undetectable in the vaginal lavage or in genital swab samples.