Skip to main content
. 2000 Aug;11(8):2803–2820. doi: 10.1091/mbc.11.8.2803

Table 2.

2D motility and dynamic morphology parameters of wild-type (Ax4), regA, and regA-rescued cells in a spatial gradient of cAMP

Cell type Number of cells Instantaneous velocity (μm/min) Positive flow (%/min) Directional change (deg/min) Maximum length (μm) Maximum width (μm)
Wild type (Ax4) 33 10.6 (±4.1) 8.5 (±2.5) 21.6 (±11.1) 21.5 (±3.4) 8.5 (±1.2)
regA 29 12.1 (±5.2) 8.8 (±2.9) 26.8 (±15.5) 23.7 (±5.3) 9.0 (±1.1)
regA-rescued 20 10.1 (±4.7) 7.2 (±2.0) 21.7 (±9.2) 23.4 (±5.2) 9.2 (±2.0)







  Cell type Number of cells Area (μm2) Roundness (%) Mean convexity (degree) Mean concavity (degree) Chemotactic index Positive chemotaxis (%)








Wild type (Ax4) 33 119 (±17) 51.4 (±8.8) 574 (±69) 215 (±70) +0.61 (±.34) 90
regA 29 127 (±36) 56.0 (±11.4) 583 (±84) 228 (±86) +0.48 (±0.28) 93
regA-rescued 20 135 (±43) 51.1 (±11.0) 610 (±95) 250 (±95) +0.67 (±0.34) 85

Parameters were computed over a 5–10-min period for each cell. In all cases, the mean (± SD) value of each parameter is for the number of cells noted. All measured parameters but the chemotactic index proved statistically indistinguishable among the three cell types, using the Student's t test or a one-tailed test of the null hypothesis, when the distributions were non-Gaussian. All p values for the former parameters were above 0.05. The p values for the chemotactic index between regA and either wild-type (Ax4) or regA-rescued cells was <0.05.