Skip to main content
. 2003 Jan;41(1):5–14. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.1.5-14.2003

TABLE 5.

Comparison of cell wall thicknesses among VRSA strains and their derivatives

Strain Mean cell wall thickness (nm ± SD)a
Parental strain Passage-derived strain Resistant mutant strain
Mu50 35.02 ± 4.01 24.45 ± 7.80 34.19 ± 4.96
MI 32.03 ± 3.60 24.13 ± 5.54 32.03 ± 6.75
NJ 34.52 ± 4.55 21.32 ± 5.64 28.83 ± 2.83
PC 32.42 ± 3.82 22.07 ± 6.55 31.85 ± 7.47
IL 30.27 ± 4.04 20.93 ± 6.06 30.05 ± 4.24
AMC11094 34.57 ± 4.82 24.04 ± 4.43 32.35 ± 4.95
99/3759-V 27.27 ± 3.44 21.13 ± 7.81 NDb
99/3700-W 29.42 ± 3.43 21.08 ± 6.11 ND
98141 27.12 ± 3.18 21.46 ± 5.82 ND
LIM2 31.43 ± 6.02 22.12 ± 6.79 29.80 ± 4.81
28160 27.65 ± 3.45 20.62 ± 5.47 ND
BR1 34.92 ± 7.18 20.67 ± 5.69 34.84 ± 5.47
BR2 31.04 ± 3.93 23.88 ± 4.56
BR3 31.45 ± 3.82 21.05 ± 7.85 30.14 ± 3.91
BR4 30.77 ± 4.62 20.75 ± 5.95 ND
BR5-1 31.72 ± 3.85 20.55 ± 6.34 ND
Mu3 26.53 ± 4.80
H1 25.99 ± 2.26
FDA209P 22.78 ± 1.85
N315 21.46 ± 2.25
ATCC 29213 21.08 ± 1.76
BR18 24.26 ± 3.96
BR22 24.57 ± 3.08
a

Morphometric evaluation of cell wall thickness was performed by using photographs of transmission electron mycroscopy images obtained at a final magnification of of ×30,000.

b

ND, not done.