Skip to main content
. 2003 Feb;41(2):803–809. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.2.803-809.2003

TABLE 5.

Agreement between diagnostic assays for leptospirosis in classifying cases as positive and controls as negative

Assays compared No. (%) of cases testing positivea No. (%) of controls testing negativeb Kappa correlation (95% CI)c
ELISA-MAT 115 (86.5) 604 (94.1) 0.78 (0.73-0.84)
ELISA-IHA 95 (71.4) 597 (93.0) 0.66 (0.59-0.73)
ELISA-LDS 110 (82.7) 559 (87.1) 0.62 (0.55-0.69)
ELISA-DST 112 (84.2) 620 (96.6) 0.86 (0.81-0.91)
IHA-MAT 105 (79.0) 595 (92.7) 0.70 (0.63-0.76)
IHA-LDS 101 (75.9) 553 (86.1) 0.57 (0.50-0.64)
IHA-DST 101 (75.9) 608 (94.7) 0.73 (0.67-0.80)
MAT-LDS 124 (93.2) 555 (86.5) 0.66 (0.60-0.72)
MAT-DST 122 (91.7) 614 (95.6) 0.85 (0.80-0.90)
DST/LDS 117 (88.0) 569 (88.6) 0.67 (0.61-0.74)
a

For each assay, a case was considered positive if the acute- and/or convalescent-phase specimen(s) tested positive. Total number of cases, 133.

b

Total number of controls, 642.

c

A kappa correlation of ≥0.75 was considered a good agreement; a correlation of 0.45 to 0.74 was considered a fair agreement, and a correlation of <0.45 was considered a poor agreement.