Skip to main content
. 2003 Feb;41(2):863–866. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.2.863-866.2003

TABLE 3.

Comparison of conventional PCR and real-time PCR

Sample and patient no. Conventional PCR result
Real-time PCR resultc
Aaa Pgb % of Aa % of Pg
Saliva
    1 + NDd 0.20 ± 0.02
    2 + 0.19 ± 0.04 ND
    3 + + 0.22 ± 0.04 1.56 ± 0.06
    4 + 0.20 ± 0.03 5.11 × 10−4 ± 1.16 × 10−4
    5 + ND 0.64 ± 0.02
    6 + ND 1.34 ± 0.13
    7 + + 0.11 ± 0.01 0.08 ± 0.00
    8 + ND 0.81 ± 0.06
    9 ND ND
    10 ND ND
Subgingival plaque
    1 + ND 1.33 ± 0.20
    2 7.16 × 10−4 ± 0.47 × 10−4 ND
    3 4.69 × 10−3 ± 0.45 × 10−3 ND
    4 + 0.11 ± 0.03 ND
    5 + ND 0.38 ± 0.04
    6 + ND 6.40 ± 0.43
    7 + + 0.02 ± 0.00 0.20 ± 0.02
    8 + ND 1.10 ± 0.16
    9 ND ND
    10 ND ND
a

Aa, A. actinomycetemcomitans.

b

Pg, P. gingivalis.

c

Data are expressed as means ± standard deviation (n = 3).

d

ND, not detected.