Skip to main content
British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) logoLink to British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.)
. 1982 Jun 19;284(6332):1830–1831. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6332.1830

Prospective double-blind comparison of buprenorphine and pethidine in ureteric colic.

I G Finlay, R Scott, C S McArdle
PMCID: PMC1498725  PMID: 6805715

Abstract

In a double-blind prospective trial 26 consecutive patients with proved ureteric colic were allocated at random to receive 100 mg pethidine or 0.3 mg buprenorphine by intramuscular injection. Pain relief was assessed by standard linear analogue and ordered categories scales. The mean pain relief on the linear analogue scale was 3.80 +/- SEM 0.64 in patients receiving pethidine and 6.86 +/- 0.40 in those receiving buprenorphine (p less than 0.001). The corresponding values for mean pain relief in the ordered categories scale was 1.78 +/- 0.26 v 2.76 +/- 0.20 (p less than 0.01). These observations suggest that buprenorphine is superior to pethidine as analgesia in ureteric colic.

Full text

PDF
1831

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Downing J. W., Leary W. P., White E. S. Buprenorphine: a new potent long-acting synthetic analgesic. Comparison with morphine. Br J Anaesth. 1977 Mar;49(3):251–255. doi: 10.1093/bja/49.3.251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Huskisson E. C. Measurement of pain. Lancet. 1974 Nov 9;2(7889):1127–1131. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)90884-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jasinski D. R., Pevnick J. S., Griffith J. D. Human pharmacology and abuse potential of the analgesic buprenorphine: a potential agent for treating narcotic addiction. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1978 Apr;35(4):501–516. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1978.01770280111012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lewis J. W. Ring C-bridged derivatives of thebaine and oripavine. Adv Biochem Psychopharmacol. 1973;8(0):123–136. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Scott R., Freeland R., Mowat W., Gardiner M., Hawthorne V., Marshall R. M., Ives J. G. The prevalence of calcified upper urinary tract stone disease in a random population--Cumbernauld Health Survey. Br J Urol. 1977;49(7):589–595. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1977.tb04536.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sierakowski R., Finlayson B., Landes R. R., Finlayson C. D., Sierakowski N. The frequency of urolithiasis in hospital discharge diagnoses in the United States. Invest Urol. 1978 May;15(6):438–441. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Walsh A. Renal colic. Br J Hosp Med. 1978 Mar;19(3):224–227. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Medical Journal (Clinical research ed.) are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES