Skip to main content
. 2003 Mar;69(3):1614–1622. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.3.1614-1622.2003

TABLE 1.

Summary of 13CO2 field respiration assays conducted in the agricultural field test plots

Substratea Treatmentb Total evolved 13CO2 (μm) 13CO2 blankc (μm) Net 13CO2 (μm) % of added 13C respired Initial rate (μm/h)
Glucose Soil cover 3.4 ± 0.3 2.3 ± 0.37 1.1 6.8 0.25
Sealed chamber
    Intact ped 7.4 ± 10 4.5 ± 6.3 2.9d 20d 0.28d
    Core 4.8 ± 1.9 1.7 ± 0.39 3.1 22 0.27
    Crushed soil 16 ± 3.7 5.7 ± 1.2 9.8 68 1.2
Phenol Soil cover 8.1 ± 0.8 5.7 ± 1.0 2.5 9.1 0.2
Sealed chamber
    Intact ped 7.2 ± 4.1 1.8 ± 0.63 5.4 20 0.2
    Core 5.5 ± 3.7 1.2 ± 1.1 4.2 16 0.1
    Crushed soil 13.5 ± 1.2 3.5 ± 0.56 9.5 37 0.5
Naphthalene Soil cover 2.6 ± 0.45 2.4 ± 0.43 0.11d
Sealed chamber
    Intact ped 0.87 ± 0.73 0.87 ± 0.69 0d
    Core 0.81 ± 0.34 0.79 ± 0.34 0.02d
    Crushed soil 2.0 ± 0.26 1.9 ± 0.25 0.1d
Caffeine Soil cover 3.2 ± 1.6 3.0 ± 1.5 0.13d
Sealed chamber
    Intact ped 1.4 ± 0.84 1.4 ± 0.81 0.03d
    Core 1.1 ± 0.45 1.0 ± 0.42 0.09d
    Crushed soil 2.5 ± 0.51 2.4 ± 0.49 0.08d
a

Aqueous substrates (glucose, phenol, and caffeine) were added as 450 μg in 0.1 ml. Naphthalene was added as 0.5 ml of a 20-ppm aqueous solution.

b

Four treatments were prepared. “Soil cover” designates field release with open-bottom chamber cover installed to trap 13CO2. The three sealed chamber treatments were incubated in the field alongside the soil cover experiment. All treatments were prepared in triplicate.

c

Blank was interpolated from 12CO2 evolved simultaneously with 13CO2.

d

Net was not significantly different from zero as judged by Student's t test comparing final total and background 13CO2.