Skip to main content
. 2003 Mar;69(3):1504–1510. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.3.1504-1510.2003

TABLE 4.

Comparison of the efficacy of PCR, isolation, and BioLog identification techniques for the detection of P. larvae in bee products

Sample Code Type of sample Country of origin PCR results (AF 6 + AF 7) Isolation (CFU/plate) BioLog probability (%)
1 2001/36 Honey Austria + >50 100
2 2001/37 Honey Austria 3.55 98
3 2001/89 Honey Austria + >50 100
4 2001/87 Honey Austria + 1.25 91
5 2001/983 Honey Austria 33.8 100
6 2000/1019 Honey Austria + 0.8 100
7 2000/1020 Honey Austria + 1 91
8 B/768/92 Honey Austria + 1 100
9 AZ2000/696 Honey Hungary + 91 100
10 AZ2000/695 Honey Austria 3.1 100
11 AZ2000/692 Honey United Kingdom 5 100
12 AZ2000/691 Honey France + >50 100
13 AZ2000/497 Honey Saudi Arabia + 10 99
14 AZ2000/1112 Honey Turkey + >50 100
15 AZ98/76 Honey USA + 3.5 100
16 AZ95/5 Honey Canada + 3.35 100
17 AZ95/22 Honey Romania + 39 95
18 AZ95/4 Honey Mexico 17 75
19 BP10/2001 Honey Sardinia/Italy + 1.58 100
20 AZ2001/94 Honey Austria + 6.2 99
21 BP28/2001 Honey Austria + 2 96
22 BP31/2001 Honey Austria + >50 99
23 ÜW3 Honey Austria + 3.6 96
24 BP6/2000 Honey Austria 0 0
25 AZ2001/280 Honey India 0 0
26 AZ2001/325 Honey India 0 0
27 ÜW5 Pollen Germany + 4.5 100
28 BP79/2000 Pollen The Netherlands + 0.25 100
29 W8 Wax Austria + 0.2 91
30 Wabe1 Brood Austria + >50 100