Abstract
Due to the complexity of human health, emphasis is increasingly being placed on the need for and conduct of multidisciplinary and/or interdisciplinary health research. Yet many academic and research organizations--and the discipline-specific associations and journals--may not yet be prepared to adopt changes necessary to optimally support interdisciplinary work. This article presents an ongoing interdisciplinary research project's efforts to investigate mechanisms and pathways that lead to occupational health disparities among healthcare workers. It describes the promises and pitfalls encountered during the research,and outlines effective strategies that emerged as a result. Lessons learned include: conflict resolution regarding theoretical and methodological differences; establishing a sense of intellectual ownership of the research, as well as guidelines for multiple authorship; and development and utilization of protocols, communication systems, and tools. This experience suggests a need for the establishment of supportive structures and processes to promote successful interdisciplinary research.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (95.8 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bowman Ann, Wyman Jean F., Peters Jennifer. The operations manual: a mechanism for improving the research process. Nurs Res. 2002 Mar-Apr;51(2):134–138. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200203000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bruhn J. G. Interdisciplinary research: a philosophy, art form, artifact or antidote? Integr Physiol Behav Sci. 2000 Jan-Mar;35(1):58–66. doi: 10.1007/BF02911166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Devers K. J. How will we know "good" qualitative research when we see it? Beginning the dialogue in health services research. Health Serv Res. 1999 Dec;34(5 Pt 2):1153–1188. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Erlen J. A., Siminoff L. A., Sereika S. M., Sutton L. B. Multiple authorship: issues and recommendations. J Prof Nurs. 1997 Jul-Aug;13(4):262–270. doi: 10.1016/s8755-7223(97)80097-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fawcett S. B., Francisco V. T., Paine-Andrews A., Schultz J. A. A model memorandum of collaboration: a proposal. Public Health Rep. 2000 Mar-Jun;115(2-3):174–179. doi: 10.1093/phr/115.2.174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fuchs V. R. The future of health economics. J Health Econ. 2000 Mar;19(2):141–157. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(99)00033-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Green L., Daniel M., Novick L. Partnerships and coalitions for community-based research. Public Health Rep. 2001;116 (Suppl 1):20–31. doi: 10.1093/phr/116.S1.20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Israel B. A., Schulz A. J., Parker E. A., Becker A. B. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173–202. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kreuter M. W., Sabol B. J., O'Donovan A., Donovan J., Klein L., Green L. W., Vliet M., Bradley T., Campuzano M. K., Tarlov A. R. Commentaries from grantmakers on Fawcett et al.'s proposed memorandum of collaboration. Public Health Rep. 2000 Mar-Jun;115(2-3):180–190. doi: 10.1093/phr/115.2.180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ragin C. C. The distinctiveness of case-oriented research. Health Serv Res. 1999 Dec;34(5 Pt 2):1137–1151. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosenfield P. L. The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Soc Sci Med. 1992 Dec;35(11):1343–1357. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90038-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yin R. K. Enhancing the quality of case studies in health services research. Health Serv Res. 1999 Dec;34(5 Pt 2):1209–1224. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]