Skip to main content
. 2003 Mar;41(3):948–953. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.3.948-953.2003

TABLE 2.

Variables used in cost-effectiveness and sensitivity analysesa

Variable Base value Lower bound Upper bound
Sensitivity (%) of MTD in smear-positive specimensb 99.6 91.8 (17) 100 (2, 6, 8, 11, 16, 20)
Specificity (%) of MTD in smear-positive specimensb 99.7 95 100 (2, 11, 19)
Proportion (%) of smear-positive specimens containing detectable MTD inhibitorsb 0, 2.3c 0 (2, 11, 19) 7.2d (17)
Proportion (%) of first smear-positive respiratory specimens that are culture-positive for M. tuberculosis 31.4e 25 98.4 (7)
Annual no. of MTD-candidate patients submitting smear-positive respiratory samples 14e 1 500
Hourly cost of labor ($) 25.47e 15 35
Marginal cost of reagents per test ($) 24e 0 100f
Marginal daily cost of respiratory isolationg ($) 27.77e
Daily cost of four-drug presumptive TB therapyg ($) 5.66h
Median length of time from MTD result to M. tuberculosis speciation resultg (days) 6e
a

References from the literature are listed in parentheses. Lower and upper bounds refer to the range over which each given variable was tested in a one-way sensitivity analysis.

b

See Table 1 for a description of how the variable was estimated.

c

0% in individuals without TB; 2.3% in individuals with TB.

d

Sensitivity of the MTD without a test for inhibitors. (A test for inhibitors was assumed in the present analysis.)

e

Estimate obtained directly from our hospital.

f

The marginal reagent cost per test of a program in which reagents are purchased at list price, and only 15 of 50 tests are performed before the reagent expiration date.

g

Variable not used in the decision analysis to determine the cost of MTD testing per early TB exclusion. Rather, the variable factors into the value that individual hospitals will assign to an early TB exclusion. See Table 3 and Fig. 1.

h

Average wholesale price in 2001.