Skip to main content
. 2002 Dec 30;3(12):research0086.1–86.2. doi: 10.1186/gb-2002-3-12-research0086

Table 4.

Estimates of pairwise sequence conservation in coding and non-coding regions between D. melanogaster and D. erecta, D. pseudoobscura, D. willistoni or D. littoralis

Species Number of bp surveyed Number of bp conserved % conserved (bp) Median length of conserved segment Average % identity of conserved segment
Coding
D. erecta 63,655 60,327 94% 39 93%
D. pseudoobscura 46,626 26,978 61% 20 91%
D. willistoni 42,224 18,774 45% 17 91%
D. littoralis 19,717 10,997 63% 17 92%
Non-coding
D. erecta 272,366 186,895 69% 24 94%
D. pseudoobscura 276,731 77,391 28% 17 95%
D. willistoni 174,421 19,700 13% 14 95%
D. littoralis 138,866 24,633 18% 15 95%
D. virilis 114,015 30,564 27% 16 95%
D. virilis [44] 114,015 29,915 26% 19 93%

Microsyntenic regions were globally aligned using AVID and conserved sequences greater than or equal to 10 bp and 90% identity were identified using VISTA. Sequences were classified as coding or non-coding using Release 3 annotations [14] exported from GadFly in VISTA format. Shown for comparison are a re-analysis of conservation between D. melanogaster and D. virilis using the current methods, as well as previous results, for a sample of non-coding regions published in [44].